Feds reluctantly decide to not deprive bloggers of 1st Amendment rights
March 26, 2006 in Overset
I wasn’t going to blog at all this weekend.
I should have known better, because I knew that there was going to be some action this weekend on the efforts by U.S. Rep.
The
In what is being described as a compromise, the FCC released revised regs that will require candidates to include on their campaign disclosure statements how much money they pay bloggers to place ads on their sites. Politicians already have to inform the FEC of all the money they pay to buy ads on television, radio and newspapers. The bloggers themselves will not have to file anything, although it’s possible that the Internal Revenue Service might come knocking on some doors.
A Washington Post article on this development assures us that “leading advocates of the blogger community” are quite happy with the rules because they will leave bloggers “free to support and attack federal candidates, much as newspapers are allowed.”
That’s funny, I was under the impression that political commentary was a right guaranteed me by the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America. Silly me.
As I previously reported on this site, I announced my refusal to comply with any regulation that tried to regulate what I place on my blog. I am pleased that I won’t be going to jail — at least not for this — but I still resent that so many people had to go to so much trouble to keep a judge and a six political appointees put an end to the free discussion of politics on the Blogosphere.
Hat tip: Murrel.
Feed



March 26th, 2006 at 10:21 am
You got that it one! This ain’t China for heaven’s sake.
March 26th, 2006 at 11:00 am
you are paranoid