Newspaper holding itself accountable for faulty editorial page

September 23, 2006
By Billy Dennis

Who said this:

Unfortunately, several of our editorials … have been based on faulty facts, providing nothing but misinformation and misrepresentation. This is unacceptable, considering that the purpose of our opinions page is to facilitate meaningful dialogue among the members of the campus community and beyond.

Unfortunately, it was the Daily Illini, and not the Journal Star, which really needs to examine how it decides what to say about anything related to the Kellar Branch and the Peoria Fire Department.

The JS’s award-winning editorial page is quite capable of insightful editorials whether I agree with them — such as today’s editorial arguing against taxpayer involvement in a hotel attached to the Peoria Civic Center – or not. But on some topics, the anonymous writers resort to petty name calling and irrationality.

My advice to the JS and the Daily Illini is this: Drop unsigned editorials. Be open about cicrumstances and relationships that suggest biases, because people know about them already. It will only improve credibility.

Journal Star,Daily Illini,editorials

Tags: , ,

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

One Response to “ Newspaper holding itself accountable for faulty editorial page ”

  1. MDD on September 24, 2006 at 9:38 am

    I have never understood how an “award winning editorial page” can be so loose with presenting facts or with the omission of facts that directly relate to their arguements.