Kissing his credibility goodbye

January 18, 2007
By Billy Dennis

Everyone needs to visit Brad Burke’s blog to tell him what they think of his opinon that KISS doesn’t belong in the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame.

Burke probably listed to a lot of Rick Springfield during the era.

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

16 Responses to “ Kissing his credibility goodbye ”

  1. Brad Burke on January 18, 2007 at 1:31 pm

    Bill,

    Never listened to Rick Springfield. But there is a Genesis song in my iPod. So maybe you’re right…I have kissed goodbye to my cred.

    Thanks for reading and pointing people toward our blog. I must admit…way, way more people siding with John Sharp on this KISS question than with myself. :)

  2. Billy Dennis on January 18, 2007 at 1:43 pm

    It’s sort of a rule that critics have tastes that are a bit more rarefied than their audiences.

    And I certainly hope you are not claiming that friggin’ GENESIS is a better band than is KISS.

  3. PeoriaIllinoisan on January 18, 2007 at 1:57 pm

    Genesis with Peter Gabriel is.

  4. Eyebrows McGee on January 18, 2007 at 2:20 pm

    “It’s sort of a rule that critics have tastes that are a bit more rarefied than their audiences.”

    That’s why I miss Gene Siskel. :( He was not above liking dumb movies or disliking arty ones.

  5. Tony on January 18, 2007 at 2:44 pm

    The band Genesis, with Peter Gabriel OR Phil Collins, has been linked to cancer, global warming, sunspots, and the Peoria Rails to Trails project.

    There is no greater evil.

  6. BJStone on January 18, 2007 at 2:51 pm

    I agree with McGee….as I just put on Brad’s blog, critical acclaim isn’t everything. Lots of “two thumbs up” movies are dogs, lots of highly-thought-of-by-critics music is beyond unlistenable to the average ear.

    And I’d be very correct in saying that the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame will be visited by more “average ears” than critics. So they should listen to the Joe Averages of the world and put in the bands that made music good enough (notice, I’m not saying “critically acclaimed” or “groundbreaking” music, I’m just saying “good enough”) to sell millions of albums and get millions of spins on the radio and sell millions of dollars of concert tickets – and maintain that success over a long period of time – into the Hall of Fame.

    The comment was already made on Brad’s blog about the Black Eyed Peas and putting “popular” but not “good” musicians in the Hall, and KISS was basically placed in that former category. Umm, no. KISS didn’t flame out. KISS was not a one-hit wonder, or even a one-trick pony band. KISS has longevity, and that should play into the Hall’s thinking. KISS is a little different than The Black Eyed Peas (at this point, check back in 20 years and see if the Peas are still there).

    Bottom line, “groundbreaking music” aside, KISS at it’s peak sold more albums in a couple of hours than the Velvet Underground did in it’s entire existence. And whenEVER some other band says “such and such band” were a positive influence on them, it’s worth something in my eyes.

    When I hear acts mention their “influences”, it seems as if it’s always Chuck Berry, Johnny Cash, Buddy Holly, The Beatles, Springsteen, The Stones, or KISS. Now, if that band gets mentioned up there with those acts, shouldn’t that be a ticket to the Hall all by itself?

  7. Kelley on January 18, 2007 at 8:25 pm

    I full-heartedly agree with you! Kiss SHOULD be in the R & R Hall of Fame. But let’s not knock on Rick Springfield guys. WHY does everyone knock on Rick Springfield when they need to say something sarcastic?? I think I know. Because ignorance is bliss. If you’ve never dove into his music (and no…not just Jessie’s Girl) then you would not really understand. He TOO deserves a spot in there as well. He is my favorite musician/writer/guitarist/vocalist of all time, with his almost 40 years in the music industry!!!! Pick up his latest DVD, Live at the Rockford…and see for yourself! Or better yet….Shock Denial Anger Acceptance from ‘04. HE ROCKS!!!! That man is a guitar GENIUS and can hold his own with the best of them. BRUCE WHO??? LOL

    YES….KISS are rock and roll legends. I am a Kiss fan and have been my whole life. I too am hoping for their name to be added. (along with my man Rick!)

    Sincerely,
    Kelley Pearson

  8. PeoriaIlliniosan on January 18, 2007 at 10:38 pm

    Ok, Tony, Genesis or Rick Springfield?

    I would suggest that Genesis (had all the members died around 1980 after recording Duke) should be in the R&R HOF.

  9. John Sharp on January 19, 2007 at 12:03 am

    Ahhh, Genesis….

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XEONfGP1aYE

    A little Rick Springfield….

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wUZm3ZVvhS8

    And if you wanted the best…you got the best…..Hall of Fame, no questions about it…no one did it better on stage…
    Fun clips..

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i4CZNInUPaY

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5U4vniMKhlM

    Gene Simmons meets Totie Fields…
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u3B590zDEcE

  10. Kelley on January 19, 2007 at 7:55 am

    Or….better yet….better than Jessie’s Girl. (his ‘new’ music!)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ytBYJy2UgQ

    My husband just got the Kissology DVD set for Christmas. Now THAT is really cool :-) If you don’t have it, it’s worth every penny!!!! I had NO idea those guys were getting by on only about $85 a week their first few years. What a shock. But look where they are NOW. Gene Simmons is unreal in those old vintage clips. I love that guy :-)

    Kelley

  11. PeoriaIlliniosan on January 19, 2007 at 8:21 am
  12. CP on January 19, 2007 at 11:39 am

    “Bottom line, “groundbreaking music” aside, KISS at it’s peak sold more albums in a couple of hours than the Velvet Underground did in it’s entire existence. And whenEVER some other band says “such and such band” were a positive influence on them, it’s worth something in my eyes.”

    Funny you should mention a band being influential on other groups and the velvet underground in the same paragraph. There’s a famous quote about the VU that says something like, “The Velvet Underground didn’t sell alot of records in their time, but everyone who did started a band.” I’m not saying Kiss shouldn’t be in the rnr hall of fame, but not including such a hugely important and influential band as the Velvet Underground would discredit the organization.

  13. BJStone on January 19, 2007 at 1:57 pm

    CP, I’m not saying the VU shouldn’t be in the Hall, either. I’m simply saying if THEY are in, KISS absolutely should be, too.

    I did say that VU is unlistenable to many people, me included, and I stand by that.

    An aside, in the 10 years I did P.A. for the Rivermen, there were always between 6-8 people on headset together during the games, and we’d occasionally play the game “overrated/underrated” and just throw out names of bands or singers or actors or athletes and then do a little impromptu poll on what category we thought they’d fall into.

    Lou Reed, Jimi Hendrix, The Doors, Zeppelin always fell into “overrated”. Not because they weren’t GOOD, but we just felt they weren’t AS good as they were made out to be in the press.

    BTW, my “underrated” list for rock usually includes INXS, Bob Seger, BTO, Bad Company, and John Mellencamp. Those five can’t get enough accolades for me to say they’re getting their proper due. Commercial success? Yes. Critical acclaim? Not as much as there should be.

  14. CP on January 19, 2007 at 5:00 pm

    BJ,

    Understood on your VU point although as a huge fan I’ve gotta urge you to revisit their back catalog.

    Although I’m not a fan of Kiss, I’d say that they deserve to be in strictly on account of their place in the cultural history of rock. I mean just like at the merchandising dollars they brought in. Not since the Beatles did a band sell their name on so much stuff. The stage act, the groupies blah blah blah…it’s all rock and roll and for that they’re in. Musically I can take it or leave it, but hey so it is.

    As for under/overratted I’m with you on Mellancamp being under and Zepplin being over (way over.) Adding to the overrated list for me would be U2 (put out some good stuff, but have been in stuck in the mud for 10 years) and Guns & Roses. Underrated? Neil Finn (crowded house, Split enz)

  15. Sabrina on February 12, 2007 at 2:12 pm

    While being in the RORHOF is an honor, it is not the definitive word on what makes a rocker credible. Credibility is in the ear of the listener.

    There is nothing wrong with either KISS or Rick Springfield. BOTH are excellent entertainers with respectable sized fanbases. They are just two poins on the rock continuum. I don’t understand this elitism that some are showing here. Don’t you know rock has had many permutations over the past 50 years? Who says you have to choose only ONE style of music to enjoy? Variety is the spice of life, after all….

  16. Sabrina on February 12, 2007 at 2:13 pm

    While being in the RORHOF is an honor, it is not the definitive word on what makes a rocker credible. Credibility is in the ear of the listener.

    There is nothing wrong with either KISS or Rick Springfield. BOTH are excellent entertainers with respectable sized fanbases. They are just two points on the rock continuum. I don’t understand this elitism that some are showing here. Don’t you know rock has had many permutations over the past 50 years? Who says you have to choose only ONE style of music to enjoy? Variety is the spice of life, after all….