<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More evidence that print is doomed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2007/04/04/more-evidence-that-print-is-doomed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2007/04/04/more-evidence-that-print-is-doomed/</link>
	<description>Media and news from the original river city</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:23:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dustbury.com &#187; The news (re)cycle</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2007/04/04/more-evidence-that-print-is-doomed/comment-page-1/#comment-107667</link>
		<dc:creator>dustbury.com &#187; The news (re)cycle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2007/04/04/more-evidence-that-print-is-doomed/#comment-107667</guid>
		<description>[...] Peoria Pundit Billy Dennis says this is &#8220;more evidence that print is doomed&#8221;:  I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s easier to use than any newspaper Web site software I&#8217;ve ever tried to use. And I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s less complicated than whatever it is the [Peoria] Journal Star uses. Any small newspaper in America can put something like this together &#8212; including paying someone to design their template &#8212; for several hundred dollars, not to mention the cost of Web hosting, which might cost $100 a month for a dedicated server. It does as good a job as presenting the distributing news in words and pictures as any printing press, which costs much, much more to use. And it doesn&#8217;t require any trees be cut down, pulped and transported across the country in trucks or on trains. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Peoria Pundit Billy Dennis says this is &#8220;more evidence that print is doomed&#8221;:  I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s easier to use than any newspaper Web site software I&#8217;ve ever tried to use. And I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s less complicated than whatever it is the [Peoria] Journal Star uses. Any small newspaper in America can put something like this together &#8212; including paying someone to design their template &#8212; for several hundred dollars, not to mention the cost of Web hosting, which might cost $100 a month for a dedicated server. It does as good a job as presenting the distributing news in words and pictures as any printing press, which costs much, much more to use. And it doesn&#8217;t require any trees be cut down, pulped and transported across the country in trucks or on trains. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dustbury.com</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2007/04/04/more-evidence-that-print-is-doomed/comment-page-1/#comment-85287</link>
		<dc:creator>dustbury.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 17:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2007/04/04/more-evidence-that-print-is-doomed/#comment-85287</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The news (re)cycle...&lt;/strong&gt;

While the Oklahoman works on rolling out NewsOK Beta, a smaller paper in the British Isles has gone for a simpler approach. The Buckinghamshire Advertiser, owned by group operator Trinity Mirror plc and selling 20,000 copies daily, has converted its......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The news (re)cycle&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>While the Oklahoman works on rolling out NewsOK Beta, a smaller paper in the British Isles has gone for a simpler approach. The Buckinghamshire Advertiser, owned by group operator Trinity Mirror plc and selling 20,000 copies daily, has converted its&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2007/04/04/more-evidence-that-print-is-doomed/comment-page-1/#comment-84992</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 00:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2007/04/04/more-evidence-that-print-is-doomed/#comment-84992</guid>
		<description>Bill, you know that your site is far from the first to implement text-underline ads. Some of my previously-favorite sites have implemented them. I&#039;m not saying that I eventually abandoned those sites /only/ because of the text-underline ads, but they were one of two main contributors (the other being articles
broken into
eight million
pages, each
having only
two words
so as to
maximize ad
impressions).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, you know that your site is far from the first to implement text-underline ads. Some of my previously-favorite sites have implemented them. I&#8217;m not saying that I eventually abandoned those sites /only/ because of the text-underline ads, but they were one of two main contributors (the other being articles<br />
broken into<br />
eight million<br />
pages, each<br />
having only<br />
two words<br />
so as to<br />
maximize ad<br />
impressions).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cory</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2007/04/04/more-evidence-that-print-is-doomed/comment-page-1/#comment-84964</link>
		<dc:creator>Cory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 15:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2007/04/04/more-evidence-that-print-is-doomed/#comment-84964</guid>
		<description>No, but there is the &quot;continue reading&gt;&gt;&gt;&quot; thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, but there is the &#8220;continue reading&gt;&gt;&gt;&#8221; thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eyebrows McGee</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2007/04/04/more-evidence-that-print-is-doomed/comment-page-1/#comment-84958</link>
		<dc:creator>Eyebrows McGee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 14:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2007/04/04/more-evidence-that-print-is-doomed/#comment-84958</guid>
		<description>Folks have been predicting the death of print for 20 years now. Rumors of its demise appear to have been exaggerated.

I&#039;ve been computerized since I was six and on teh internets since I was fourteen and I vastly prefer print newspaper to reading online. And there are good reasons to prefer print.

This might come as a shock, but we actually DON&#039;T NEED 24 hour news. There are few things short of tornados I need to know about RIGHT THIS INSTANT, and they have sirens for that. (And -- shock of shocks -- they actually still break into broadcast network television for things that are REALLY important.) And there are a lot of people my age who are opting out of cable TV and 24-hour connectedness in favor of choosing our times and places to get data. The wired generation knows better than the Boomers how empty and repetitive 24-hour data streams can be, because we&#039;ve never lived in a world without them. I was TWO when CNN joined the world. I do not remember a time before 24-hour news and I have never attended a school without a computer lab.

Small wonder, then, that I prefer my news in a single discreet chomp, well-written by competent journalists and analyzed by people who follow a story for years and know its ins and outs. I&#039;ve been surrounded by the vapidity of instant-streaming news since I was an infant. I prefer something a little more substantial and a little less torrential.

Besides which, reading at a computer continues to be unpleasant, and there are few people who spend all day working in front of one who then want to do their leisure reading at a terminal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Folks have been predicting the death of print for 20 years now. Rumors of its demise appear to have been exaggerated.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been computerized since I was six and on teh internets since I was fourteen and I vastly prefer print newspaper to reading online. And there are good reasons to prefer print.</p>
<p>This might come as a shock, but we actually DON&#8217;T NEED 24 hour news. There are few things short of tornados I need to know about RIGHT THIS INSTANT, and they have sirens for that. (And &#8212; shock of shocks &#8212; they actually still break into broadcast network television for things that are REALLY important.) And there are a lot of people my age who are opting out of cable TV and 24-hour connectedness in favor of choosing our times and places to get data. The wired generation knows better than the Boomers how empty and repetitive 24-hour data streams can be, because we&#8217;ve never lived in a world without them. I was TWO when CNN joined the world. I do not remember a time before 24-hour news and I have never attended a school without a computer lab.</p>
<p>Small wonder, then, that I prefer my news in a single discreet chomp, well-written by competent journalists and analyzed by people who follow a story for years and know its ins and outs. I&#8217;ve been surrounded by the vapidity of instant-streaming news since I was an infant. I prefer something a little more substantial and a little less torrential.</p>
<p>Besides which, reading at a computer continues to be unpleasant, and there are few people who spend all day working in front of one who then want to do their leisure reading at a terminal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justanobserver</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2007/04/04/more-evidence-that-print-is-doomed/comment-page-1/#comment-84956</link>
		<dc:creator>justanobserver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 13:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2007/04/04/more-evidence-that-print-is-doomed/#comment-84956</guid>
		<description>But the Journal Star now does paste advertising stickers on their front page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But the Journal Star now does paste advertising stickers on their front page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emtronics</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2007/04/04/more-evidence-that-print-is-doomed/comment-page-1/#comment-84945</link>
		<dc:creator>Emtronics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2007 11:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2007/04/04/more-evidence-that-print-is-doomed/#comment-84945</guid>
		<description>At least a newspaper doesn&#039;t have those annoying green underlined ads that pop up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least a newspaper doesn&#8217;t have those annoying green underlined ads that pop up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
