Jim McConoughey must have said “naive” and ‘inexperienced” a dozen times during his brief news conference today. Which is pretty must his biggest weapon against Aaron Schock, who was courteous enough to give McConoughey and other opponents John Morris an opening by suggesting that the United States arm Taiwan with nuclear weapons and arm freedom fighters in Iran.
All three are running for the GOP nomination for Ray LaHood’s seat in Congress.
I’ll post the official version of McConoughey’s remarks to the press when they become available and I have time.
The questions from the press were interesting.
I wanted to know why McConoughey didn’t issue a statement after Schock said these things last week. He said that it took them a while to consult some experts. I think it might because they wanted for the stink to hit the media first, and that didn’t happen until the State Journal-Register covered it.
Jonathan Ahl of WCBU was sorta playing word games by suggesting that Schock was actually being responsible by making the statement, because the public needs to know what opinion candidates have on foreign policy. The word Ahl suggested that McConoughey meant was “stupid.”
And Karen McDonald, the PJS reporter who’s article didn’t mention Aaron’s desire to ship nukes to Taiwan? She asked McConoughey why he didn’t say what HE wanted to do about China and Taiwan. My two cents: Why bother asking? The Journal Star won’t print it.
UPDATED: Edited for clarity.
UPDATED: The McConoughey sent this press release:
Aaron Schock’s Support of Giving Nuclear Weapons to Taiwan Irresponsible
Peoria, IL – Congressional candidate Jim McConoughey today, called on one of his opponents to retract reckless and irresponsible remarks he delivered late last month. Aaron Schock, a 26-year-old lawmaker who is running for Congress has issued a foreign-policy position advocating “if China continues to be irresponsible about nuclear proliferation in Iran, we should tell them that if they do not care about proliferation – and since they are enablers of it in Iran, that if they don’t change their position, we will sell Pershing nuclear missiles to Taiwan for their defense.†Aaron continues; “Non proliferation will either be enforced universally or not at all – it is their choice. The Chinese will come around, I have no doubt.†Those explosive comments are discussed in today’s (11/8) Springfield State Journal-Register newspaper in the Bernard Schoenburg column on the Editorial page, (available at this link: http://www.sj-r.com/Opinion/stories/19687.asp)
McConoughey countered in a prepared statement; “The United States has achieved its global leadership role by combining strong national defense with the idealism of freedom loving peoples. We didn’t achieve it by making irresponsible threats and advocating reckless ideas. Not only is this idea illegal under the Nuclear Proliferation Treaty, it will likely lead to the threat of war and possibly nuclear war. The position of U.S. Representative is a position that requires judgment, maturity and steadiness. Foreign policies that Aaron supports clearly show poor judgment, lack of maturity and unsteadiness.â€
McConoughey continued; “In addition to the military destabilization in the Eastern Hemisphere that Aaron’s policies could cause, his positions also destroy the hard work that this Country has done on behalf of agriculture and manufacturing to broaden global market presence in China and beyond. The business and trade relationships are indicative of responsible and collaborative efforts to realize this global economy in which we live. Should America provide nuclear weapons to someone who would intend to threaten China with those weapons would wipe-out years of efforts, agreements and relationships that we’ve developed – many from right here in Central Illinois.â€
As printed in the Springfield State Journal Register today, international policy expert and University of Illinois Political Science Professor Paul Diehl says of Aaron’s policies: “The statement about selling nuclear weapons to Taiwan reflects an incredible naiveté about international relations. Transferring nuclear weapons technology to any state is a violation of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. It would also encourage other states to do the same, specifically to enemies of the United States.â€
“I can’t think of anything more provocative to China than giving Taiwan nuclear weapons, assuming that they would even foolishly accept them. A nuclear Taiwan would not be strong enough to deter China and indeed (would) probably provoke an attack before the missiles could be deployed.â€
Jim McConoughey is a Peoria Republican running for 18th District Congressional seat from which Congressman Ray LaHood is retiring. McConoughey, President of the Heartland Partnership, leads the Peoria-area business community. In addition to his 26 years of experience in business and public service, McConoughey has provided strong leadership in Central Illinois and has exemplified integrity.
Tags: , Aaron Schock, China, Jim McConoughey, nuclear, Taiwan




Nice job. As usual, you’re on the ball.
Yes, nice job, Billy.
I called Schock’s office earlier and asked about this whole thing. Talked to a guy named “Eric.” It sounds like the spin is beginning. He would only say that Schock believes we need to “get tough with Iran” and that “China needs to be a part of that.” Whatever that means! He also said that there would be a press release issued later today. Can’t wait to see what it says.
Also, have you noticed that Schock is the only candidate for this office who still has his website under construction? I asked when the website was going to be up so we could get this information directly from his website, but “Eric” didn’t know. He also didn’t have a copy of Schock’s announcement speech.
I agree that Karen really missed the big story by not covering the nukes angle a week ago. But in fairness to her at this event, I think she asked a completely reasonable question. McConoughey was calling a press conference to criticize Schock for his foreign policy blunder, but that’s really no reason to vote for McConoughey. What’s his policy stance on Taiwan, China, and Iran?
It would have been better for McConoughey to contrast his (supposed) superior foreign policy experience with Schock’s naivete and inexperience. Did that come out at the press conference?
Sounds like Jonathan and Karen were doing reporting…asking what his position was rather than just covering an attack on another candidate. What we do need to know is what each candidate’s position is…we can then sort through those we agree with and those we don’t.
I could care less why he waited a week to respond to Schock’s position, but still don’t know McConoughey’s position.
Yeah, I’m certainly not going to vote for McConoughey simply because he thinks his opponent is naive. He’s going to have to offer more substance than that. I’d be embarrassed to call a press conference if that was all I had to say.
Jim’s position (as I heard it) is economic and political diplomacy as the best way to try to have a hand in solving such problems. He didn’t give more specifics than that.
I’m not endorsing it, saying its right or wrong, but that was his response to my direct question about what his position is.
Good answer….he can use it dozens of times in resonse to a variety of questions without divulging any specifics……it looks (for better or worse) that Schock is going to run an issue oriented campaign where he clearly puts forward his position on issues. At least we’ll know where he stands and can vote yes or nay based upon our view of that position.
At the very least, it’s refreshing.
As usual, your hatred for the PJS comes through. Nice job in giving Schock free press.
[...] Politics: Republican candidate for Ray LaHood’s seat advocates giving Taiwan nuclear weapons. I love it; pass the [...]