Today’s news: At least they’re consistent
Links via the Journal Star:
- One of the gripes I have with the Journal Star is that it makes readers wait for important political news because it runs the Word on the Street column on Monday. They do it so that there’s at least something resembling real news in the Monday paper. There are times in which is the WotS column is the only thing of any real substance in the thing, except for routine police and fire news. So while Web-savvy readers feasted on the Aaron Schock debacle over the weekend, those PJS readers who wanted a little more were left without. And because WotS is essentially written before the start of the weekend, there’s no mention of the second Schock snafu– the fact that he voted against an Iran divestiture bill. Really, PJS — you have got to move faster than this in the digital age.
- I must be great working for the Journal Star editorial board. There is no requirement that the positions taken remain constant — even the space of the same editorial. Take today’s editorial, in which they criticize Pat Robertson for being a sanctimonious right winger, then criticize him for NOT being a consistent sanctimonious right winger. Editorials are supposed to be an attempt to convince readers to take a position, not the random firing of neurons put into typeface. That’s what columns like Phil Luciano’s are for.
- Not that they don’t occasionally make sense.








“A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines.” — Ralph Waldo Emerson