<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Politics: Obama education policy bad news for science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2008/04/24/obama-education-policy-bad-news-for-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2008/04/24/obama-education-policy-bad-news-for-science/</link>
	<description>News, politics and the media in the River City</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: postsimian</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2008/04/24/obama-education-policy-bad-news-for-science/#comment-104046</link>
		<dc:creator>postsimian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 02:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/?p=10227#comment-104046</guid>
		<description>*snort* Yes, because they got SO much closer to curing genetic diseases and creating applicable uses of stem cells by spending years figuring out a way to circumvent a ban born out of a very narrow, eclectic definition of ethics.

Due to the subjective nature of ethics, I guess we'll have to agree to disagree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*snort* Yes, because they got SO much closer to curing genetic diseases and creating applicable uses of stem cells by spending years figuring out a way to circumvent a ban born out of a very narrow, eclectic definition of ethics.</p>
<p>Due to the subjective nature of ethics, I guess we&#8217;ll have to agree to disagree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C. J. Summers</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2008/04/24/obama-education-policy-bad-news-for-science/#comment-104044</link>
		<dc:creator>C. J. Summers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 01:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/?p=10227#comment-104044</guid>
		<description>Moral of the story:  Science isn't stymied by staying within ethical bounds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moral of the story:  Science isn&#8217;t stymied by staying within ethical bounds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: postsimian</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2008/04/24/obama-education-policy-bad-news-for-science/#comment-104040</link>
		<dc:creator>postsimian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/?p=10227#comment-104040</guid>
		<description>I had considered this as well.  Moral of the story, where there's a will there's a way?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had considered this as well.  Moral of the story, where there&#8217;s a will there&#8217;s a way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C. J. Summers</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2008/04/24/obama-education-policy-bad-news-for-science/#comment-104038</link>
		<dc:creator>C. J. Summers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 22:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/?p=10227#comment-104038</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Anyway, they’ve solved the ethical dilemma: they can revert skin cells back into their stem cell state.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Something that never would have happened if Bush hadn't held firm on banning federal funding for embryonic stem cell research.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Anyway, they’ve solved the ethical dilemma: they can revert skin cells back into their stem cell state.</p></blockquote>
<p>Something that never would have happened if Bush hadn&#8217;t held firm on banning federal funding for embryonic stem cell research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: postsimian</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2008/04/24/obama-education-policy-bad-news-for-science/#comment-104030</link>
		<dc:creator>postsimian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/?p=10227#comment-104030</guid>
		<description>The only difference between them is in the perception of certain, non-scientific groups.  These people also ignorantly extended embryonic stem cell research to include all stem cell research, regardless of the source.  Anyway, they've solved the ethical dilemma:  they can revert skin cells back into their stem cell state. They can be created in a petri dish, and can produce any cell in the body.  

The only possible ethical dilemma has to do with human cloning:  the creation of egg and sperm cells, which could simply be banned.  They haven't been able to create viable sperm cells anyway, so it's a non-issue at this point. 

There really needs to be more education about this.  The real ethical problem is how many more opportunities we'll miss for scientific advancement that could benefit the human race and cure disease or ease the suffering of millions.  I mean, is it just me, or does religion seem innately opposed to making people's lives better?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only difference between them is in the perception of certain, non-scientific groups.  These people also ignorantly extended embryonic stem cell research to include all stem cell research, regardless of the source.  Anyway, they&#8217;ve solved the ethical dilemma:  they can revert skin cells back into their stem cell state. They can be created in a petri dish, and can produce any cell in the body.  </p>
<p>The only possible ethical dilemma has to do with human cloning:  the creation of egg and sperm cells, which could simply be banned.  They haven&#8217;t been able to create viable sperm cells anyway, so it&#8217;s a non-issue at this point. </p>
<p>There really needs to be more education about this.  The real ethical problem is how many more opportunities we&#8217;ll miss for scientific advancement that could benefit the human race and cure disease or ease the suffering of millions.  I mean, is it just me, or does religion seem innately opposed to making people&#8217;s lives better?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon E. Mouse</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2008/04/24/obama-education-policy-bad-news-for-science/#comment-104028</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon E. Mouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 17:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/?p=10227#comment-104028</guid>
		<description>Stem Cells may be scientific research, but there are serious ethical questions about it. I don't think there are any major religions opposed to human space flight. That's why it is apples and oranges.
Huge differences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stem Cells may be scientific research, but there are serious ethical questions about it. I don&#8217;t think there are any major religions opposed to human space flight. That&#8217;s why it is apples and oranges.<br />
Huge differences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: postsimian</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2008/04/24/obama-education-policy-bad-news-for-science/#comment-104025</link>
		<dc:creator>postsimian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 05:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/?p=10227#comment-104025</guid>
		<description>Blahh, criticize him all you want.  It's nice to hear someone actually talking about his policies for a change.  It's just... what?  One crappy part of the plan invalidates the rest?  NASA not launching a shuttle is not the same as the whole country or education system being stagnant.  Why isn't there any give on this?

Besides, if they have to put off the next shuttle, it's not like the would or even can cancel the current program.  

One more thing:  Stem Cells = scientific research.  Space Exploration = scientific research.  Apples and apples.  Providing funding for one and not the other is a double standard, plain and simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blahh, criticize him all you want.  It&#8217;s nice to hear someone actually talking about his policies for a change.  It&#8217;s just&#8230; what?  One crappy part of the plan invalidates the rest?  NASA not launching a shuttle is not the same as the whole country or education system being stagnant.  Why isn&#8217;t there any give on this?</p>
<p>Besides, if they have to put off the next shuttle, it&#8217;s not like the would or even can cancel the current program.  </p>
<p>One more thing:  Stem Cells = scientific research.  Space Exploration = scientific research.  Apples and apples.  Providing funding for one and not the other is a double standard, plain and simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlargenBlog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; McCain Keeps Us Guessing</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2008/04/24/obama-education-policy-bad-news-for-science/#comment-104007</link>
		<dc:creator>BlargenBlog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; McCain Keeps Us Guessing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 06:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/?p=10227#comment-104007</guid>
		<description>[...] agree with cutting funds to NASA and over-meddling in their space program (which is what prompted the pundit article), and have a few reservations about certain areas of the program, overall it&#8217;s pretty [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] agree with cutting funds to NASA and over-meddling in their space program (which is what prompted the pundit article), and have a few reservations about certain areas of the program, overall it&#8217;s pretty [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon E. Mouse</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2008/04/24/obama-education-policy-bad-news-for-science/#comment-104000</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon E. Mouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 23:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/?p=10227#comment-104000</guid>
		<description>No, I am not kidding.
I call a minimum eight year break in American human spaceflight stagnant.
NASA is such an incredibly small part of the budget and is capable of producing huge, positive returns, both scientific and political.
Stem Cells/Space exploration = apples/oranges

And, if you'd note any of my previous political posts, you would see I am, as a rule, not critical of Mr. Obama. In this case, I found an issue that is important (Human Space Exploration) to me in which someone (in this case, Mr. Obama) took a position that I disagreed with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I am not kidding.<br />
I call a minimum eight year break in American human spaceflight stagnant.<br />
NASA is such an incredibly small part of the budget and is capable of producing huge, positive returns, both scientific and political.<br />
Stem Cells/Space exploration = apples/oranges</p>
<p>And, if you&#8217;d note any of my previous political posts, you would see I am, as a rule, not critical of Mr. Obama. In this case, I found an issue that is important (Human Space Exploration) to me in which someone (in this case, Mr. Obama) took a position that I disagreed with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: postsimian</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2008/04/24/obama-education-policy-bad-news-for-science/#comment-103989</link>
		<dc:creator>postsimian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/?p=10227#comment-103989</guid>
		<description>Anon, you're kidding right?  I don't see him even implying that we should stop trying to be creative and inventive.  Think about it reasonably:  would anybody, especially a politician, ever say or imply that we should be stagnant?  If someone did have that position, could they even be running?  The apathetic don't have the drive to jump through hoops to get a job they don't want to do.  It doesn't make sense.  That, and he didn't say it... or imply it... or give any indication that this is his attitude.

Anyway, if you're going to apply that standard to space exploration, you need to apply it to embryonic stem cell research as well.  No offense or anything, but with all the extrapolation, it just looks like any excuse to paint him in a negative light will do.  

No grey area, no "this part is bad, but this other part is good."  It's either all good or all bad, and I don't understand it.  The world isn't black and white.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon, you&#8217;re kidding right?  I don&#8217;t see him even implying that we should stop trying to be creative and inventive.  Think about it reasonably:  would anybody, especially a politician, ever say or imply that we should be stagnant?  If someone did have that position, could they even be running?  The apathetic don&#8217;t have the drive to jump through hoops to get a job they don&#8217;t want to do.  It doesn&#8217;t make sense.  That, and he didn&#8217;t say it&#8230; or imply it&#8230; or give any indication that this is his attitude.</p>
<p>Anyway, if you&#8217;re going to apply that standard to space exploration, you need to apply it to embryonic stem cell research as well.  No offense or anything, but with all the extrapolation, it just looks like any excuse to paint him in a negative light will do.  </p>
<p>No grey area, no &#8220;this part is bad, but this other part is good.&#8221;  It&#8217;s either all good or all bad, and I don&#8217;t understand it.  The world isn&#8217;t black and white.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2008/04/24/obama-education-policy-bad-news-for-science/#comment-103982</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/?p=10227#comment-103982</guid>
		<description>Maybe BJ can remind us which camp really ducked out...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe BJ can remind us which camp really ducked out&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VONSTER</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2008/04/24/obama-education-policy-bad-news-for-science/#comment-103981</link>
		<dc:creator>VONSTER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/?p=10227#comment-103981</guid>
		<description>Or Oxford....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or Oxford&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy Dennis</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2008/04/24/obama-education-policy-bad-news-for-science/#comment-103979</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 05:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/?p=10227#comment-103979</guid>
		<description>I get your point, C.J. If B.J. thinks that George W. deserves criticism for serving in the Guard and for :ducking" duty in Vietnam, making him unqualified to order men into War, then it must logically follow that McCain must deserve praise for serving in harms way and is qualifies to send men to war.

Personally, I've never been proven to me that George W. ducked out of anything. Flying fighter jets even during peacetime is not an activity for cowards.

The real chicken shits are the ones went off to Canada.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get your point, C.J. If B.J. thinks that George W. deserves criticism for serving in the Guard and for :ducking&#8221; duty in Vietnam, making him unqualified to order men into War, then it must logically follow that McCain must deserve praise for serving in harms way and is qualifies to send men to war.</p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;ve never been proven to me that George W. ducked out of anything. Flying fighter jets even during peacetime is not an activity for cowards.</p>
<p>The real chicken shits are the ones went off to Canada.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C. J. Summers</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2008/04/24/obama-education-policy-bad-news-for-science/#comment-103977</link>
		<dc:creator>C. J. Summers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 05:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/?p=10227#comment-103977</guid>
		<description>John McCain served in Vietnam.  No timidity in him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John McCain served in Vietnam.  No timidity in him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bjstone</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2008/04/24/obama-education-policy-bad-news-for-science/#comment-103976</link>
		<dc:creator>bjstone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 04:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/?p=10227#comment-103976</guid>
		<description>"I see this as an indicator of timidity, and I don’t think that is a trait I want in a president."

Yeah, like hiding in the National Guard, and then going AWOL even from THAT, to avoid real duty. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I see this as an indicator of timidity, and I don’t think that is a trait I want in a president.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, like hiding in the National Guard, and then going AWOL even from THAT, to avoid real duty. <img src='http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon E. Mouse</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2008/04/24/obama-education-policy-bad-news-for-science/#comment-103973</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon E. Mouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 04:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/?p=10227#comment-103973</guid>
		<description>I think it does. This is way, way more than the dollars and cents. 
What I see is Obama saying that we need to stop trying to be creative and inventive. We need to deny our urge to explore. Let's not climb that mountain now - mostly because it is too expensive. Well, guess what? It isn't going to get any cheaper sitting on our hands.
It is more than dollars and cents. It isn't just about what's "out there" but also what's inside us, as a human race.
I see this as an indicator of timidity, and I don't think that is a trait I want in a president.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it does. This is way, way more than the dollars and cents.<br />
What I see is Obama saying that we need to stop trying to be creative and inventive. We need to deny our urge to explore. Let&#8217;s not climb that mountain now - mostly because it is too expensive. Well, guess what? It isn&#8217;t going to get any cheaper sitting on our hands.<br />
It is more than dollars and cents. It isn&#8217;t just about what&#8217;s &#8220;out there&#8221; but also what&#8217;s inside us, as a human race.<br />
I see this as an indicator of timidity, and I don&#8217;t think that is a trait I want in a president.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: postsimian</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2008/04/24/obama-education-policy-bad-news-for-science/#comment-103972</link>
		<dc:creator>postsimian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 04:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/?p=10227#comment-103972</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I don't agree at all with that.  Like I said, it should be at the discretion of NASA.  But one point doesn't invalidate the whole plan, either.

Vonster, honored though I may be, when the hell did I become king?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I don&#8217;t agree at all with that.  Like I said, it should be at the discretion of NASA.  But one point doesn&#8217;t invalidate the whole plan, either.</p>
<p>Vonster, honored though I may be, when the hell did I become king?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon E. Mouse</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2008/04/24/obama-education-policy-bad-news-for-science/#comment-103963</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon E. Mouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 02:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/?p=10227#comment-103963</guid>
		<description>http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewnews.html?id=1285</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewnews.html?id=1285" rel="nofollow">http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewnews.html?id=1285</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon E. Mouse</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2008/04/24/obama-education-policy-bad-news-for-science/#comment-103962</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon E. Mouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 02:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/?p=10227#comment-103962</guid>
		<description>Obama wants to take a minimum three-year gap between Shuttle and Orion and make it a minimum eight-year gap. THAT is out of whack, in and of itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama wants to take a minimum three-year gap between Shuttle and Orion and make it a minimum eight-year gap. THAT is out of whack, in and of itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VONSTER</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2008/04/24/obama-education-policy-bad-news-for-science/#comment-103954</link>
		<dc:creator>VONSTER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/?p=10227#comment-103954</guid>
		<description>From the King of Snark. LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the King of Snark. LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: postsimian</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2008/04/24/obama-education-policy-bad-news-for-science/#comment-103953</link>
		<dc:creator>postsimian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/?p=10227#comment-103953</guid>
		<description>No, Vonster, it's little petty comments like this that do it for me.  That's why you were banned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Vonster, it&#8217;s little petty comments like this that do it for me.  That&#8217;s why you were banned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VONSTER</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2008/04/24/obama-education-policy-bad-news-for-science/#comment-103952</link>
		<dc:creator>VONSTER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/?p=10227#comment-103952</guid>
		<description>Careful, Mouse. He's gets mad and frustrated when you don't agree with him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Careful, Mouse. He&#8217;s gets mad and frustrated when you don&#8217;t agree with him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: postsimian</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2008/04/24/obama-education-policy-bad-news-for-science/#comment-103951</link>
		<dc:creator>postsimian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/?p=10227#comment-103951</guid>
		<description>How so?  Bush signed a bill that increases the science budget from.. I think it was $5b to $25b.  It's a good start.  But Obama's plan puts emphasis on science and math.  I'm not so optimistic about the proposed federal daycare system, but beyond that, the plan seems pretty solid.  

By the way, he didn't quote the entirety of his plan.  You can read the plan itself at the link I posted up above.

Which parts did you disagree with/think are out of whack?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How so?  Bush signed a bill that increases the science budget from.. I think it was $5b to $25b.  It&#8217;s a good start.  But Obama&#8217;s plan puts emphasis on science and math.  I&#8217;m not so optimistic about the proposed federal daycare system, but beyond that, the plan seems pretty solid.  </p>
<p>By the way, he didn&#8217;t quote the entirety of his plan.  You can read the plan itself at the link I posted up above.</p>
<p>Which parts did you disagree with/think are out of whack?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon E. Mouse</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2008/04/24/obama-education-policy-bad-news-for-science/#comment-103950</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon E. Mouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 19:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/?p=10227#comment-103950</guid>
		<description>I wasn't all that aware of the history of the writer, but he quoted the entirety of Obama's plan - a very worrisome plan, at that.
Even if you lop off the commentary, Obama's science and education priorities are seriously out of whack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#8217;t all that aware of the history of the writer, but he quoted the entirety of Obama&#8217;s plan - a very worrisome plan, at that.<br />
Even if you lop off the commentary, Obama&#8217;s science and education priorities are seriously out of whack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: postsimian</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2008/04/24/obama-education-policy-bad-news-for-science/#comment-103948</link>
		<dc:creator>postsimian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 18:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/?p=10227#comment-103948</guid>
		<description>What?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VONSTER</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2008/04/24/obama-education-policy-bad-news-for-science/#comment-103946</link>
		<dc:creator>VONSTER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/?p=10227#comment-103946</guid>
		<description>Sorry - I forgot I'm not supposed to talk to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry - I forgot I&#8217;m not supposed to talk to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: postsimian</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2008/04/24/obama-education-policy-bad-news-for-science/#comment-103944</link>
		<dc:creator>postsimian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/?p=10227#comment-103944</guid>
		<description>Oh, that's on the low end of estimates too, by the way.  Some estimates say 900 billion dollars to slightly over $1 trillion when adding defense systems, weapons/equipment procurement, etc.  It also takes well over half of the U.S.'s total discretionary spending.  Or, maybe I'm just interpreting it "too liberally."

Try harder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, that&#8217;s on the low end of estimates too, by the way.  Some estimates say 900 billion dollars to slightly over $1 trillion when adding defense systems, weapons/equipment procurement, etc.  It also takes well over half of the U.S.&#8217;s total discretionary spending.  Or, maybe I&#8217;m just interpreting it &#8220;too liberally.&#8221;</p>
<p>Try harder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: postsimian</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2008/04/24/obama-education-policy-bad-news-for-science/#comment-103943</link>
		<dc:creator>postsimian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/?p=10227#comment-103943</guid>
		<description>The baseline to keep the military running for fiscal year 2008 is 481.4 billion.  Add 73 billion dollars for the War on Terror plus 145 billion dollars in supplemental funding.  That is $699.4 billion dollars bub.  So I rounded up a few hundred million.  Pardon me for my lack of preciseness.

And I don't read the Daily Kos, Vonster.  In fact, the only reason I know it exists is because you've pointed it out over and over.  It's free advertising for them, but I still don't read it.  news.google.com and a few magazine/newspaper subscriptions do it for me, with the occasional TV thrown in for good measure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The baseline to keep the military running for fiscal year 2008 is 481.4 billion.  Add 73 billion dollars for the War on Terror plus 145 billion dollars in supplemental funding.  That is $699.4 billion dollars bub.  So I rounded up a few hundred million.  Pardon me for my lack of preciseness.</p>
<p>And I don&#8217;t read the Daily Kos, Vonster.  In fact, the only reason I know it exists is because you&#8217;ve pointed it out over and over.  It&#8217;s free advertising for them, but I still don&#8217;t read it.  news.google.com and a few magazine/newspaper subscriptions do it for me, with the occasional TV thrown in for good measure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VONSTER</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2008/04/24/obama-education-policy-bad-news-for-science/#comment-103942</link>
		<dc:creator>VONSTER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/?p=10227#comment-103942</guid>
		<description>Take out the costs associated with the Iraq deployment and isn't it more like 250-300?

He should have gotten a story from KOS, huh?

You still crack me up Reno.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take out the costs associated with the Iraq deployment and isn&#8217;t it more like 250-300?</p>
<p>He should have gotten a story from KOS, huh?</p>
<p>You still crack me up Reno.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: postsimian</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2008/04/24/obama-education-policy-bad-news-for-science/#comment-103937</link>
		<dc:creator>postsimian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/?p=10227#comment-103937</guid>
		<description>Oh, one more thing, you might want to change the article of your title.  Let's just say "misleading" is about as polite as I can put it:

http://www.barackobama.com/issues/education/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, one more thing, you might want to change the article of your title.  Let&#8217;s just say &#8220;misleading&#8221; is about as polite as I can put it:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.barackobama.com/issues/education/" rel="nofollow">http://www.barackobama.com/issues/education/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: postsimian</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2008/04/24/obama-education-policy-bad-news-for-science/#comment-103936</link>
		<dc:creator>postsimian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/?p=10227#comment-103936</guid>
		<description>The article had me until I read the resources the author linked, many of which were misrepresented, then the fact that he was comparing billion-dollar space missions to $50,000 life-saving heart surgery.  But judging from the source, I'm not surprised.  That site is infamous for right-wing hackery and blistering ignorance.

Among the things the article DID get right is Obama's desire to "trim" NASA's budget.  I don't agree with this.  I also think shuttle missions or mission delays should be at the discretion of NASA, not the president.  If anything, he should be cutting the over-bloated military budget.  ~700 billion dollars a year is pretty damn excessive.  There's no excuse for it.

Spending $18b on math and science education, however, doesn't go far enough in my opinion.  He's right--other countries are leaving us behind.  Part of it has to do with funding, sure.  Part of it comes from fundamentalist brainwashing that convinces people science is evil and seeks to destroy their beliefs.  But the majority of it, in my opinion, comes from the attitude, complacency and laziness of society.  Also, urban schools are in the gutter for a plethora of ADDRESSABLE, FIXABLE reasons.  If you ask me, we ought to be taking $100 billion of the military's budget and putting it into education, not a paltry $18 billion.  To complement this, we ought to have a specialized Job Corps for kids who just don't want to be there, so they'll at least have SOME kind of skill to get them by.

Anyway, nobody believes Obama is out to destroy NASA, like you make it sound.  I'd recommend a reliable news source next time, Anon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article had me until I read the resources the author linked, many of which were misrepresented, then the fact that he was comparing billion-dollar space missions to $50,000 life-saving heart surgery.  But judging from the source, I&#8217;m not surprised.  That site is infamous for right-wing hackery and blistering ignorance.</p>
<p>Among the things the article DID get right is Obama&#8217;s desire to &#8220;trim&#8221; NASA&#8217;s budget.  I don&#8217;t agree with this.  I also think shuttle missions or mission delays should be at the discretion of NASA, not the president.  If anything, he should be cutting the over-bloated military budget.  ~700 billion dollars a year is pretty damn excessive.  There&#8217;s no excuse for it.</p>
<p>Spending $18b on math and science education, however, doesn&#8217;t go far enough in my opinion.  He&#8217;s right&#8211;other countries are leaving us behind.  Part of it has to do with funding, sure.  Part of it comes from fundamentalist brainwashing that convinces people science is evil and seeks to destroy their beliefs.  But the majority of it, in my opinion, comes from the attitude, complacency and laziness of society.  Also, urban schools are in the gutter for a plethora of ADDRESSABLE, FIXABLE reasons.  If you ask me, we ought to be taking $100 billion of the military&#8217;s budget and putting it into education, not a paltry $18 billion.  To complement this, we ought to have a specialized Job Corps for kids who just don&#8217;t want to be there, so they&#8217;ll at least have SOME kind of skill to get them by.</p>
<p>Anyway, nobody believes Obama is out to destroy NASA, like you make it sound.  I&#8217;d recommend a reliable news source next time, Anon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
