<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Media: State Journal-Register switching Web sites this week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2008/05/11/media-state-journal-register-switching-web-sites-this-week/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2008/05/11/media-state-journal-register-switching-web-sites-this-week/</link>
	<description>Media and news from the original river city</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:15:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: C J Sutton</title>
		<link>http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/2008/05/11/media-state-journal-register-switching-web-sites-this-week/comment-page-1/#comment-104371</link>
		<dc:creator>C J Sutton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 18:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoriapundit.com/blogpeoria/?p=10302#comment-104371</guid>
		<description>Geeez...  With a top of the Sunday front page article on changes to their web site, PLUS a commentary by the publisher inside opposite the editorial, how could you miss the SJ-R&#039;s announcement of site changes???  I&#039;m not expecting a lot.  They still have nothing on their site (at 1:20) about a pretty large fire in a southwest side duplex overnight.  For the last couple of weeks, there has been more statewide &quot;breaking&quot; (?) news than there has been local breaking stuff or even updates.  I do expect more ad space on the new site, and I assume the new ownership will regard that as an improvement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geeez&#8230;  With a top of the Sunday front page article on changes to their web site, PLUS a commentary by the publisher inside opposite the editorial, how could you miss the SJ-R&#8217;s announcement of site changes???  I&#8217;m not expecting a lot.  They still have nothing on their site (at 1:20) about a pretty large fire in a southwest side duplex overnight.  For the last couple of weeks, there has been more statewide &#8220;breaking&#8221; (?) news than there has been local breaking stuff or even updates.  I do expect more ad space on the new site, and I assume the new ownership will regard that as an improvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
