Posts Tagged ‘blogging’

I am a big money blogger, relatively speaking

Friday, July 3rd, 2009

I got a huge chuckle out of this tidbit from Michael Miner in the Chicago Reader;

In my column in this week’s print edition, I mistakenly said the Tribune was paying Chicago Now bloggers $5 per 10,000 hits. I called that the equivalent of carfare.

I stand corrected: the Tribune’s paying $5 per 1,000 local hits, the equivalent of — well, carfare. Bill Adee, the paper’s innovation chief, tells me Chicago Now has some 65 bloggers and last month recorded 700,000 pageviews. That works out to $3,500 split 65 ways, or about $54 a blogger for the month.

I sat down and added up all my add revenue during the course of a year, divided by 12 and concluded that I earned roughly $150 a month. Of course, Site Meter tells me my pageviews are roughly 50,000 a month.

It’s carfare. But it’s also Web hosting fare. And ISP fare. If I quit my job and start selling ads like crazy and manage to consistently get 15-20 times the ad revenue I currently get, I can make a living from full-time blogging. At least I have a head start over those saps at Chicago Now.

Woo Hoo!

Welcome new Blog Peoria Project member

Thursday, July 2nd, 2009

The notorious HipKat has migrated his blog from Blogger — where it was languishing with few readers — to the Blog Peoria Project. Now, his is part of the small but growing community of Peoria-area bloggers.

HipKat also is active in the Peoria.com community.

Reconsidering Peoria Pundit

Tuesday, June 23rd, 2009

I’ve been blowing off meetings of the Peoria City Council for a while now. More on that later.

Today, I went to Whitey’s for pizza, carbonated refreshment and post meeting conversation.

I was sitting there with Gary Sandberg, C.J. Summers and three nice people who are trying to affect some changes in how the City of Peoria does business.

I won’t violate the “What is Said at Whitey’s Stays at Whitey’s” rule. But I will say this: The conversation turned to how policy is made in Peoria.

The short answer: “Poorly.”

Technically, policy is might be set in public, but the process of arriving at the decision is not. Remember th e good old days when people argues on the floor of the council. I miss those days. All the crap got laid out in front of God and everybody. These days, stuff appears on the agenda. Someone will make a short speech in favor of it, and someone else — probably Sandberg — will point out the shortcomings. Sometimes there’s not even that. And I’m not talking about routine business, but important votes.

And then there is a vote and it passes.

So how does policy get made. The answer is, if not on the floor of the council, is during phone calls and emails, and during social events. The public is not welcome, unless they are invited.

So that’s why I haven’t been attending many meetings. I’ve been under the weather, sure. But I’ve also been sick of hauling my ass to council meetings and liveblogging a bunch of 11-0 and 10-1 votes on things that should have been a lot closer.

So how does someone have a voice in changing policy?

I’ve seen what packing the gallery can do to carefully crafted plans. I’ve witnessed what a ton of phone calls can do switch votes. And I’ve seen how blogging the Holy Hell out of an issue can, sometimes, get the people affected by government agitated enough to do something about it.

But I haven’t really been blogging the Holy Hell out of anything recently, except Iran and maybe some School Board stuff.

So, the green is going bye-bye for now (I’m still going to be all over Twitter). This blog is moving back to Peoria. But more than that, tt’s going to take a different kind of blogging that what I’ve been doing recently. I’m open to suggestions, comments, criticism and insults.

Some personal business

Friday, June 5th, 2009

The new work schedules are out, and it looks like my work day is going to be starting 90 minutes earlier, giving me more time in the evening.

This is a good thing, as the old schedule essentially gave me too little time in the morning and too little time in the evening to really do anything.

Media: How to transition from dead trees to online

Friday, May 15th, 2009

NOTE: The following post first appeared on Oct. 4, 2007. Recent posts about staff departures at the Journal Star, and more misery in the newspaper business, made me think it was time to revisit the idea of what newspapers need to do to adapt and survive. That list doesn’t include shedding reporters. I’ve done some minor editing and added a few small suggestions.

dead_tree.jpgI’m still thinking about my post about Scott Adams belief that it’s an economic fact that online will eventually replace print media. There have a been many predictions about the demise of the newspaper. Some of the dates in those predictions have come and passed. But ad sales DO continue to decline. Newspapers DO continue to lay off staffers, or not replace reporters who quit or retire.

Maybe they will still be around five years from now. Maybe not. But they almost certainly won’t be printed on paper 100 years from now. The only question is exactly when the last dead-tree newspaper will be printed. The trick for newspapers is to be one of those that make the transition to online.

Here are some radical ideas. All are based on the premise that the decline of print and the rise of online is NOT something to be staved off. Instead, it is something to be embraced and encouraged. It lowers fixed costs and lets news organizations devote the more of their resources toward paying people to gather the news, instead of killing trees and tossing paper on porches:

  1. Hold a meeting of all employees. Tell them that effective immediately, their paychecks are coming from an online news organization. Tell them that job of print-only reporter/editor has been eliminated. Tell them they all have jobs as reporters for your Web site, as long they are willing to commit to it, and make the necessary adjustments to their newsroom culture. Oh, and if you are thinking of using this as an excuse to do away with unions or to outsource jobs, I hope you get hit by a bus. You would deserve to.
  2. Make the following changes in your newsroom culture: Abandon the conceit that good journalism is defined as something that happens only in newspapers, and that since online journalism isn’t on paper, it cannot be good journalism. Readers do not buy your newspapers because it’s printed in paper. Ink on paper is a medium for delivering the content. It is NOT the content; it is not why people by the newspaper. The product the readers are buying is the reporting. If newspaper industry apologists would shut up and think for a moment, they would realize this.
  3. All deadlines are now “as soon as you get a story done that is reasonably free of spelling errors and typos.” In other words,  put the article on line ASAP. Additional details can be added as they come in. Back in ancient times, they called this “beating the competition.” Deal with it.
  4. Take all feature content out of the dead-tree version of the newspaper. This includes the comics page, the bridge column, cross words, sports stats, stock prices, etc. Don’t give anyone ANY reason to go out and buy a copy of the paper. Put it ALL online instead. Your print version should be a stripped-down version of the online version, not the other way around.
  5. Raise the price of single issues. The Peoria Journal Star charges $1 on weekdays. Double it. Then triple it if sales don’t drop enough. If senior citizens complain and stop buying, then, well, screw them. The survival of your news business is at stake. Senior citizens aren’t going to be customers in 10 years anyway, to be blunt about it. Besides, if my mother can get the news online, so can yours.
  6. Restrict ad sales in the newspaper only to those who also buy ads online. After a year or two, stop selling ads in the newspaper altogether. Wean your advertisers off dead trees because it is in your interest to do so.
  7. Start charging people to gain full access to your online content. Do it now. Don’t wait. Online subscriptions should be far less than the cost of a daily newspaper subscription. It should cost customers less because it costs media companies far less. Putting your local content online for free stinks. It is stupid. You paid people to produce it, you paid syndicates for the features. You have the right to make a buck, and people WILL pay because your newspaper is STILL the only place they can get that much local content and the quality content I’m assuming your employees produce. And if you’re NOT producing high-quality content, you are screwed anyway. I am continually astounded at how many genuinely smart people in the news business think no one will subscribe to a news site for $5 a month, but will instead pay $365 a bloody year to buy newspapers out of ugly little news boxes.
  8. Make sure the amount of news online on any given day exceeds the amount in the dead tree edition. Also, there’s no real reason to NOT give your online readers access to more comics and columns that you could fit in your newspaper. Stop thinking in terms of limited space. Remember, it is the ONLINE edition that has to be the premium version of your news content.
  9. Train your reporters and editors to write for online. Readability is now the only consideration. Learn how to avoid journalistic shorthand. Stop thinking in terms of limited space. Think in terms of answering as many questions as possible, and giving readers the resources to find out more.
  10. Do not hire bloggers to replace reporters. Guys like C.J. Summers and myself have a watchdog role to play, but the meat and potatoes of journalism is the full-time reporter who covers a beat. There is no substitute for an experienced beat reporter who knows where the bodies are buried and who works for a newspaper that likes to uncover the corpses (not that there aren’t bloggers who aren’t capable of digging up a body or two). Going online-only lets your newspaper spend money on reporters, not to ship rolls of paper and barrels of ink to your plant, then to deliver copies of your paper door to door. It’s the 21st-frigging-century for crying out loud. However, if you want to pay bloggers to provide added value and hits to your online product, feel free. Call me.
  11. Take down the firewall between today’s online news and your archives. If anything, charge for new stories, and give away yesterday’s news for free instead. It is stupid that newspapers do the opposite. Make access to old stories at minimum as easy to access as today’s stories. Someone reading about last night’s city council meeting should be able to click on a link to last week’s council meeting, AND the one five years ago when they discussed the very same issue.
  12. You shall read and try to understand all 95 theses of the Cluetrain Manifesto. Perhaps THEN you will understand why unsigned editorials fail in the 21st century.
  13. Slapping Google Adsense onto your online site isn’t going to cut it. Learn how to sell online ads to LOCAL customers. Most online ads link to customer Websites. If your good customers don’t have good Websites, perhaps that’s a business opportunity for you.
  14. Change your hiring policies. If an applicant has no blog, don’t interview them. The same with applicants with no HTML skills.
  15. Want to civilize your reader comments? Limit comments to paid subscribers.

THIS BLOG HAS MOVED

Monday, August 11th, 2008

Peoria Pundit is now operating at pundit.blogpeoria.com.

Please adjust your blogroll.

Blog: More than 1 million served

Wednesday, March 26th, 2008

Sometime Tuesday, Site Meter recorded the 1,000,000th unique daily visitor to PeoriaPundit.com.

I have no idea who it what or what brought them here. Was it a regular visitor who wanted get his or her daily fix? Was it someone lured here by promises of pics of Paige Davis stripping?

And I have to concede that the number is no doubt off by a bit. My internal metrics show many more hits a day than Site Meter records. And I’ve switched domains and blogging platforms many times, and I probably passed 1 million a while ago.

Nevertheless, I guess 1 million visitors is kind of a big deal. But it’s not that big of a deal.

I’m more concerned about whether or not Peorians think I’m accomplishing anything here.

I’ve been interviewed in receive weeks by journalists writing articles for Illinois Issues and Numero. In both cases, they said they wanted to talk to me because I’m supposed to be the top boss blogger in Peoria. Feh. I’m just an early adopter, that’s all. And I’ve kept doing it, while others have decided to get on with their lives.

Meanwhile I keep railing away about TIFs and enterprise zones, downtown museums and civic centers.

Site news: Why I did it

Sunday, February 17th, 2008

There’s a good article in Sunday’s Journal Star about anonymous comments and their role in the public debate. The Henry Holling situation — and how anonymous commenters tried to spread lies about the man on this and other blogs — is mentioned.

Naturally, someone in the comments section attacks me for selling out, kissing ass and general brown nosing. I posted my usual replies. It’s as tedious and boring as it usually is. If you aren’t familiar with the background, go read it.

(more…)

Blogging: ANOTHER new Peoria blogger

Sunday, December 2nd, 2007

It’s called “City without a Subway.” It’s an anonymous pundit-style blog, with several snarky posts already up.

And Peoria does too have a Subway, in fact more than one. They’ve got one inside Wal-Mart, one at Campustown, one at University and Glen and one waaaaaay out on North Knoxville.

UPDATE: Marathon Pundit links to this post, noting:

“Peoria is a bloggy town.:

We have to be.

Blogging: We have met Big Brother, and it is us

Tuesday, November 27th, 2007

The Washington Post, the most mainstream of all the Mainstream Media, is once again pondering the Blogosphere and the very concept of citizen journalism (NOTE: I henceforth refuse to put quotes around the phrase). The article is generally fair, and includes some quotes from a tired old blog basher:

“The term ‘citizen journalist’ has an Orwellian ring to it,” says Andrew Keen, author of “The Cult of the Amateur,” who’s criticized the Web 2.0-Wikipedia world, where everyone can become their own editors.

“People are becoming Big Brother, either with a camcorder or a keyboard, and following the candidates around. It’s ridiculous. You can’t just be a great journalist, the same way you can’t be a great chef or a great soccer player.”

Journalists, he continues, “follow a set of standards, a code of ethics. Objectivity rules. That’s not the case with citizen journalists. Anything goes in that world.”

There’s just so much here that needs to be said:

1. Blogging and citizen journalism is Orwellian (a term that means government control the media for the purpose of controlling what people think). The Internet is mostly ungoverned by any government, and has done more to spread diverse points of view and provide access to sources of information than any other innovation since the invention of printing press.

Blogs and citizen journalism have given INDIVIDUAL PEOPLE the power of the press. And THIS is Orwellian? It is the antithesis of Orwellian.The book 1984 was about the masses being under constant monitoring by the government, which limited access to information through control of the media. Today, we have the masses putting the government and the media under scrutiny, then disseminating the information they get to anyone who wants it.

2. Bloggers with keyboards and camcorders are becoming the new Big Brother. Keen has himself performed as act of Orwellian doublespeak that would have amazed even George Orwell for its audacity.

3. Citizen journalists cannot be great journalists. Really? And just who decides who is a great journalist? Usually, the journalists themselves are happy to tell us. But in the end it is decided by news consumers. That’s why Walter Lippmann is more respected today than Walter Winchell, even though the latter enjoyed more commercial success. History will also decide which of today’s Big Cheese bloggers are more worthy of respect, ideologues like Michelle Malkin and Markos Moulitsas or some guy like Joe Gandelman. And every day across this nation, citizen journalists are doing acts of journalism that won’t appear in the journalism school textbooks. Citizen journalism as a whole has done some amazing reporting at the national level. Perhaps Keen’s arguments are self-serving, as the mainstream media itself has been the target of some of this reporting. Rathergate anyone?

And I thank reporter Jose Antonio Vargas for introducing me to Faye Anderson and Anderson@Large.

UPDATE: Thanks to Faye for the shoutout. Her commitment to citizen journalism (and the fine links on her site) has inspired me to do more with The Blog Peoria Project.

Media: Peoria’s bloggers are kicking ass, taking names

Monday, November 19th, 2007

Rich Miller has some kind words to say about Peoria Pundit (and less kind words for the Journal Star) in his most recent syndicated newspaper column.

I liked this line:

Peoria probably has more political bloggers per capita than anywhere in the state.

Finally, there’s something about Peoria that isn’t lagging 10-20 years behind the rest of the world! Seriously, if Peorians are blogging in larger than normal rates, we do, it’s because we need to, for the reasons outlined in Rich’s fine column.

Look at the “Peoria Bloggers” and “Blog Peoria members” sections of my blogroll. There are too many of them to keep up. Topics range from cats and dogs to the big issues of the day. They all have some value. I highly recommend Peoria Chronicle, PeoriaIllinoisan and Knight in Dragonland.

As proud as I am about Peoria Pundit’s relative success, I am more proud for having done my small part in encouraging other Peoria-area residents to start blogging.

The Founding Fathers gave us freedom of the press. But the truism over the past two centuries has been that freedom of the press belongs to the rich people who own the presses. Not anymore. The Internet (combined with blogging platforms like Blogger, WordPress and Movable Type) have given freedom of the press to everyone. There are homeless unemployed people who have blogs that they regularly maintain.

And THAT, my friends, is what citizen journalism is: A promise made by the Founding Fathers being kept. When I started this thing — six years ago, come January — pundit blogging was derided as a fad, like citizen band radio. Individual blogs come and go. But do these idiots really think that blogging itself is going to go away? Do they think the public at large will get tired of having a voice in politics? Do they think we are all going to stop complaining about corporate-minded media that’s more interested in stockholders’ profits than in fulfilling the promise of the 1st Amendment?

I may or may not being doing this 20 years from now, but I absolutely am sure SOMEONE will be doing it. There already are DOZENS of people doing it, right here in Peoria. We’re not going away. The media and the government (two institutions that feed on each other) is simply going to have to change, because the citizen journalists won’t allow the status quo to remain unchallenged.

UPDATE: Link corrected.

Local: Blogger Bash recap (UPDATED 5x)

Wednesday, October 31st, 2007

The bash was a huge success and a fun time was had by all.

Rich Miller of Capitol Fax never showed (too busy rounding up news and gossip out of Springfield, no doubt). None of the students from Jonathan Ahl’s class showed up. There quite a few first-time bashers, from including the folks responsible for Tails from the River City, The Atheists Down the Street, Secret Server, Ramble On and Problems are for Solving.

I’ll for get someone mad at me if I tried to mention everyone who was there. I neglected to set out s sign-in sheet OR even to pass out that “Hello! My name is … ” stickers

Suffice it to say the usual folks showed up. If you were there, and didn’t get a mention, I apologize. Please leave your name and a link in the comments section, thank you.

We did have two special guests.

Matt Bisbee, who’s working on Jim McConoughey’s campaign stopped buy to chat with me and the other bloggers. He’s a nice guy, we chatted about public radio and the effect blogging is having on politics. Apparently, Peoria Pundit is a frequent topic on the public radio show he’s involved with over there.

Not long after one Matt left, another stopped by: Matt Jones, a frequent commenter. We chatted about news, politics and the law. Matt’s a staunch GOPer and a supporter of Aaron Schock. We chatted a bit about the complexities of campaign finance regulations, a topic that he touched on his one and only post on Peoria Pundit.

Matt, a former prosecutor, made a case for his former boss, Peoria County State’s Attorney Kevin Lyons. He says Lyons’ biggest strength is also his biggest weakness, namely his unwillingness to consider public reaction when he decides who to prosecute and for what charges to file.

Do I have any scoops as a result of these chats? Not really, other than there’s probably going to be a meeting soon among all three campaigns for the GOP nomination for Ray LaHood’s 18th District Congressional seat. The topic will be the behind the scenes complaints about Federal Election Commission rules violations. Apparently, everyone is finding fault with everyone else.

Oh, yeah. One other bit of news: The female bloggers are making noise about having their own Blogger Bash. Fine. let them have their little hen party. We manly-man male bloggers will hold out OWN bash, where we’ll tell dirty jokes, ogle women and belch loudly and unashamed.

And if you see Eyebrows, insist she tell you what happened at the gynecologist.

UPDATE: I forgot another newbie, Scott Fletcher, formerly of Podcheck Review. He’s got another blog now, but I do NOT have the URL. Send it to me ASAP. He described it as a blog about podcasting, software writing and what happens when your child poops in the bathtub. Sounds like a must-read to me.

UPDATE 2: Jen feels slighted.

UPDATE 3: Scott F.’s site is here.

UPDATE 4: Oh, great! Now Ms. PH feels snubbed. Can I help it if I am so fascinating?

UPDATE 5: SOMEONE was glad to be there.

Site news: Ummm … thanks, I think

Thursday, October 18th, 2007

.Elaine Hopkins of Peoria Story (who STILL doesn’t allow commenting on her site) noted my recent expression of frustration:

Duh — blogging can be work.

It’s journalism when done right. That means covering events, interviewing people, finding information. That can be fun, but it’s also work, and few people can afford to pursue full time work without a paycheck attached.

Even if a blogger/journalist doesn’t need a paycheck to survive, other interesting events intervene: vacations, entertainment, family obligations. Soon it’s tempting to say ‘to heck with that meeting, that issue. Who cares anyway!’

That said, let’s hope Bill Dennis and C. J. Summers don’t become blogger dropouts. They perform very valuable services to the community, digging out information and presenting opinions and analysis that the mainstream media may not have the resources to present.

Even when they are wrong, or wrong headed, the work of bloggers — mostly volunteer apparently — matters as much or more to the community than the activities many volunteers pursue, from organizing fund raisers and running interest groups to backing politicians.

Elaine, I’ll count on you to keep me informed of when I am wrong. Or at least when YOU think I’m wrong. I’ll reserve judgment. And open up comments, already, huh? What are you afraid of? Even Vonster opened up his site.

But don’t worry about me quitting. This stuff keeps me sane, which is a difficult task, believe me.

C.J. thinks he can quit blogging for a month

Sunday, November 26th, 2006

Yeah, yeah, yeah. He’s going to be too busy to blog for about a month.

Ha!

He won’t be able to resist. He’ll be posting less, I’m sure. But once you’ve been bitten by the blogging bug, there’s no cure.

Related Amazon ads:

Take This Job & Shove ItDon\'t Sweat the Small Stuff at Work: Simple Ways to Minimize Stress and Conflict While Bringing Out the Best in Yourself and Others (Don\'t Sweat the Small Stuff Series) Simplify Your Christmas: 100 Ways to Reduce the Stress and Recapture the Joy of the Holidays (Elaine St. James Little Books)

Blogging,Christmas,Grace Presbyterian

From the blogger rumor mill …

Monday, November 20th, 2006

The buzz in the Illinois Blogosphere is that a certain anonymous Central Illinois blogger will not only return to full-time blogging today but will “come out of the closet,” as it were.

I will neither confirm or deny any rumors.

Illinois,blogging