Posts Tagged ‘blogs’
Wednesday, July 1st, 2009
Wanna make some noise about a band you’ve heard for the first time? A dining experience left a bad taste in your mouth? Wasted a good two hours at the movie theater you’ll never get back? Sick of the crap on television?
By all means let the Blog Peoria Network know. Current BP members can contact me, and I’ll sign ‘em up as contributor editors of Upon Further Review.
Now that Blog Peoria is on a vigorous server than can handle WPMu, I’m looking to resurrect some blogs.
Just visit the site for an idea of what I am looking for.
Tags: blogpeoria, blogs, site issues Posted in Overset | No Comments »
Tuesday, June 30th, 2009
C.J. Summers is THE must read blogger in Peoria. Hands down.
Tags: bloggers, blogs Posted in Overset | 2 Comments »
Sunday, June 21st, 2009
Look, folks. It is unethical for bloggers to take freebies from the companies whose products and services they review. Announcing they you have received the freebie takes most, but not all, of the stink off the practice.
I know, it seems innocuous. But when you use your blog to perform a journalistic activity — like review products and services –you assume some ethical responsibilities. These responsibilities are there whether you want to call yourself a journalist or not.
So, who are you hurting? We’ll, guys like me.
I’d kind of like to be taken half-seriously as a journalist. Therefore I don’t take gifts to baseball games (although I’d like to catch a Chiefs game this season) and I don’t accept tickets to fundraisers (even though a free Lebanese meal is awful tempting).
So, I’ve never written a review of a restaurant, a movie or a play that I or my employer didn’t pay for. It doesn’t make me saint or anything. It just means that if I say I liked something, I really liked it.
But because so many other bloggers have their hands in the cookie jar, the Feds feel obligated to step in and do some regulatin‘:
The practice has grown to the degree that the Federal Trade Commission is paying attention. New guidelines, expected to be approved late this summer with possible modifications, would clarify that the agency can go after bloggers — as well as the companies that compensate them — for any false claims or failure to disclose conflicts of interest.
It would be the first time the FTC tries to patrol systematically what bloggers say and do online. The common practice of posting a graphical ad or a link to an online retailer — and getting commissions for any sales from it — would be enough to trigger oversight.
Oh, this is just frigging great. I have ads on my site. Soon, the Feds will be able to use that as a pretext to investigate me. If they are worried that the ability of bloggers to take money might affect what they write, think of what will happen after FTC gets the ability to meddle. Oh, you bet your ass it will affect what bloggers write about.
I run Google Adsense. Does this mean I’m being deceptive if I praise some new feature on Google?
And why pick on bloggers? Television stations and newspapers constantly skew coverage to the benefit of advertisers.
How may stories did local TV stations do about the how you really, really, really had to go out and buy a digital converter for your television, all the while taking money from electronics stores who openly sponsored stations’ digital coverage? And that coverage often presented incorrect information.
Every newspaper I wrote for went out of their way to promote advertisers when handing out news assignments. But it was so common I used to get funny, confused looks from ad reps when I told them I wasn’t interested in their stupid suggestions. And all of them printed special sections of some sort that existed only as a way to sell ads and get advertisers’ names in the paper.
Where are the new regulations giving the FTC the power to halt these abuses?
Not long ago, the Federal Election Commission was trying to regulate bloggers because some of them took ad money from politicians. In fact, they wanted to define a link to a politician’s Web site as a form of contribution.
That was defeated. We can beat this too. But unethical bloggers and their pay-to-blog schemes have got to stop, and good riddance. We should have higher standards that the pimps and whores who run the newspaper and television industries.
Tags: bloggers, blogs, FCC, FTC, regulations Posted in On the Media | 4 Comments »
Friday, May 15th, 2009
NOTE: The following post first appeared on Oct. 4, 2007. Recent posts about staff departures at the Journal Star, and more misery in the newspaper business, made me think it was time to revisit the idea of what newspapers need to do to adapt and survive. That list doesn’t include shedding reporters. I’ve done some minor editing and added a few small suggestions.
I’m still thinking about my post about Scott Adams belief that it’s an economic fact that online will eventually replace print media. There have a been many predictions about the demise of the newspaper. Some of the dates in those predictions have come and passed. But ad sales DO continue to decline. Newspapers DO continue to lay off staffers, or not replace reporters who quit or retire.
Maybe they will still be around five years from now. Maybe not. But they almost certainly won’t be printed on paper 100 years from now. The only question is exactly when the last dead-tree newspaper will be printed. The trick for newspapers is to be one of those that make the transition to online.
Here are some radical ideas. All are based on the premise that the decline of print and the rise of online is NOT something to be staved off. Instead, it is something to be embraced and encouraged. It lowers fixed costs and lets news organizations devote the more of their resources toward paying people to gather the news, instead of killing trees and tossing paper on porches:
- Hold a meeting of all employees. Tell them that effective immediately, their paychecks are coming from an online news organization. Tell them that job of print-only reporter/editor has been eliminated. Tell them they all have jobs as reporters for your Web site, as long they are willing to commit to it, and make the necessary adjustments to their newsroom culture. Oh, and if you are thinking of using this as an excuse to do away with unions or to outsource jobs, I hope you get hit by a bus. You would deserve to.
- Make the following changes in your newsroom culture: Abandon the conceit that good journalism is defined as something that happens only in newspapers, and that since online journalism isn’t on paper, it cannot be good journalism. Readers do not buy your newspapers because it’s printed in paper. Ink on paper is a medium for delivering the content. It is NOT the content; it is not why people by the newspaper. The product the readers are buying is the reporting. If newspaper industry apologists would shut up and think for a moment, they would realize this.
- All deadlines are now “as soon as you get a story done that is reasonably free of spelling errors and typos.” In other words, put the article on line ASAP. Additional details can be added as they come in. Back in ancient times, they called this “beating the competition.” Deal with it.
- Take all feature content out of the dead-tree version of the newspaper. This includes the comics page, the bridge column, cross words, sports stats, stock prices, etc. Don’t give anyone ANY reason to go out and buy a copy of the paper. Put it ALL online instead. Your print version should be a stripped-down version of the online version, not the other way around.
- Raise the price of single issues. The Peoria Journal Star charges $1 on weekdays. Double it. Then triple it if sales don’t drop enough. If senior citizens complain and stop buying, then, well, screw them. The survival of your news business is at stake. Senior citizens aren’t going to be customers in 10 years anyway, to be blunt about it. Besides, if my mother can get the news online, so can yours.
- Restrict ad sales in the newspaper only to those who also buy ads online. After a year or two, stop selling ads in the newspaper altogether. Wean your advertisers off dead trees because it is in your interest to do so.
- Start charging people to gain full access to your online content. Do it now. Don’t wait. Online subscriptions should be far less than the cost of a daily newspaper subscription. It should cost customers less because it costs media companies far less. Putting your local content online for free stinks. It is stupid. You paid people to produce it, you paid syndicates for the features. You have the right to make a buck, and people WILL pay because your newspaper is STILL the only place they can get that much local content and the quality content I’m assuming your employees produce. And if you’re NOT producing high-quality content, you are screwed anyway. I am continually astounded at how many genuinely smart people in the news business think no one will subscribe to a news site for $5 a month, but will instead pay $365 a bloody year to buy newspapers out of ugly little news boxes.
- Make sure the amount of news online on any given day exceeds the amount in the dead tree edition. Also, there’s no real reason to NOT give your online readers access to more comics and columns that you could fit in your newspaper. Stop thinking in terms of limited space. Remember, it is the ONLINE edition that has to be the premium version of your news content.
- Train your reporters and editors to write for online. Readability is now the only consideration. Learn how to avoid journalistic shorthand. Stop thinking in terms of limited space. Think in terms of answering as many questions as possible, and giving readers the resources to find out more.
- Do not hire bloggers to replace reporters. Guys like C.J. Summers and myself have a watchdog role to play, but the meat and potatoes of journalism is the full-time reporter who covers a beat. There is no substitute for an experienced beat reporter who knows where the bodies are buried and who works for a newspaper that likes to uncover the corpses (not that there aren’t bloggers who aren’t capable of digging up a body or two). Going online-only lets your newspaper spend money on reporters, not to ship rolls of paper and barrels of ink to your plant, then to deliver copies of your paper door to door. It’s the 21st-frigging-century for crying out loud. However, if you want to pay bloggers to provide added value and hits to your online product, feel free. Call me.
- Take down the firewall between today’s online news and your archives. If anything, charge for new stories, and give away yesterday’s news for free instead. It is stupid that newspapers do the opposite. Make access to old stories at minimum as easy to access as today’s stories. Someone reading about last night’s city council meeting should be able to click on a link to last week’s council meeting, AND the one five years ago when they discussed the very same issue.
- You shall read and try to understand all 95 theses of the Cluetrain Manifesto. Perhaps THEN you will understand why unsigned editorials fail in the 21st century.
- Slapping Google Adsense onto your online site isn’t going to cut it. Learn how to sell online ads to LOCAL customers. Most online ads link to customer Websites. If your good customers don’t have good Websites, perhaps that’s a business opportunity for you.
- Change your hiring policies. If an applicant has no blog, don’t interview them. The same with applicants with no HTML skills.
- Want to civilize your reader comments? Limit comments to paid subscribers.
Tags: blogging, blogs, journalism, mainstream media, Newspapers, online, Online news Posted in On the Media | 12 Comments »
Saturday, May 9th, 2009
I love this theme
It will let any registered member make their own original posts. Also, all replies are now posted on front page. More content/commenter oriented
Tags: bloggins, blogs, p2, site news, WordPress Posted in Overset | 6 Comments »
Monday, August 11th, 2008
Peoria Pundit is now operating at pundit.blogpeoria.com.
Please adjust your blogroll.
Tags: blogging, blogpeoria, blogs, WordPress Posted in site news | Comments Off
Wednesday, May 14th, 2008
Check this out: The spiffy new State Journal-Register Web site has an easy-to-access pagelisting all their house bloggers … followed by a list of “Sprngfieldish” bloggers.
Very cool.
My advice to the SJ-R: Constantly monitor this list of links. Bloggers come and go. In Peoria, this is especially true.
And I notice that Disarranging Mine is conspicuously absent from the SJ-R list.
$10 bucks says the soon-to-be-revamped PJStar site won’t do this at all. Which is their right, of course. And if they do, it would take a lot of testicular fortitude to link to a blogger who constantly insults their edit board and their corporate overlords.
Tags: bloggers, blogs, j-bloggers Posted in Citizen Journalism, Watchdog | 2 Comments »
Wednesday, May 14th, 2008
Click on these links. And click them often:
- I’m up to my old tricks at It’s Billy’s Blog.
- Jonathan Ahl links to Peoria Pundit, not once, not twice, but three times (here and here).
- Pammy Darlin’ makes a comment on beauty.
- Laura gives D150 bosses some advice they won’t follow in a million years.
- PeoriaIllinoisan does the same thing, only to petty criminals. I know, I know … a difference that MAKES no difference …
- Kisser is back.
- All hail is breaking loose.
- C.J. caught someone in government using blogs in a smart way.
- Being the man of Jen’s dreamsisn’t necessarily a good thing.
- Ah, the joys of apartment living. At least Cory doesn’t have to mow the lawn.
- Merle’s never been a fan of the library expansion. He still isn’t.
- Scott Janz is up to his usual crap.
- James has some thoughts about when rulers sin. I’m asking: When aren’t they?
Tags: blogs, links, Peoria blogosphere Posted in Citizen Journalism | 1 Comment »
Sunday, May 4th, 2008
… is that it is far, far more flexible and feature packed than it was before. If you currently have a Blogger-dot-com blog, treat yourself to some extra features by logging into the draft Blogger home page and changing to one of the new templates, then putting some newfangled widgets on your site.
It’s what I’m using here.
The only thing that it’s missing that a serious blogger would want is an integrated feature allow users to export their posts and settings to other platforms.
Tags: blogger, blogs Posted in Citizen Journalism | 2 Comments »
Thursday, April 24th, 2008
Obviously, I’m blogging again.
I had planned to come back a few days from now, but I wanted to get the information about the looming parental revolt at Keller Primary out into the Blogosphere.
And, yes, the site was down briefly today, as I forgot to pay my bill online. I intended to do it before I left for work, but I didn’t get a chance to do so … BECAUSE my sources on the Keller story kept bending my ear. So blame them. I had to wait until my lunch break.
I really do think I needed a few days off, as I was running on empty for the past month. I realized that I was actually giving up sleep, staring at my computer for blogworthy subjects. Combined with some stressful events in my life, that make the quality of my posts decline.
I think the stress will level off soon, and I’ll be back to the usual output before long.
And I want to thank Anon E. Mouse, David Jordan and Diane Vespa for posting while I was away. Good posts, too! Keep it up.
Tags: blogs, site news Posted in Citizen Journalism | Comments Off
Wednesday, March 26th, 2008
Sometime Tuesday, Site Meter recorded the 1,000,000th unique daily visitor to PeoriaPundit.com.
I have no idea who it what or what brought them here. Was it a regular visitor who wanted get his or her daily fix? Was it someone lured here by promises of pics of Paige Davis stripping?
And I have to concede that the number is no doubt off by a bit. My internal metrics show many more hits a day than Site Meter records. And I’ve switched domains and blogging platforms many times, and I probably passed 1 million a while ago.
Nevertheless, I guess 1 million visitors is kind of a big deal. But it’s not that big of a deal.
I’m more concerned about whether or not Peorians think I’m accomplishing anything here.
I’ve been interviewed in receive weeks by journalists writing articles for Illinois Issues and Numero. In both cases, they said they wanted to talk to me because I’m supposed to be the top boss blogger in Peoria. Feh. I’m just an early adopter, that’s all. And I’ve kept doing it, while others have decided to get on with their lives.
Meanwhile I keep railing away about TIFs and enterprise zones, downtown museums and civic centers.
Tags: blogging, blogs, hits, site meter, visitors Posted in Citizen Journalism | 4 Comments »
Friday, February 29th, 2008
It turns out Barack Obama is one of those people.
Hat tip: SCAM.
Tags: Barack Obama, blogs, Lynn Sweet Posted in Statehouse & Capitol | 2 Comments »
Thursday, January 3rd, 2008
On this day in 2002, I created the blog that would come to be known as Peoria Pundit.
So, while your humble writer is 44 years old, this blog would be starting its second semester of kindergarten if it were alive.
But in the Blogosphere, 6 years is well past middle age.
I don’t recall the the exact number of blogs estimated to have been created during the past decade. A coupel years ago, it was well more than 10 million. The vast majority were started and abandoned almost as quickly. It’s rare than a blog lasts more than a year. The oldest blogs are 10 years old. Blogging started really taking off about eight years ago.
So in blog years, I’m a senior citizen. If there was an AARP for blogging, I’d be a member.
And as a senior citizen, I have the right to drone on endlessly, tell stories I’ve told before and expect the young ‘uns to keep quiet. But I will not exercise this right, and will instead be brief and not too sentimental (although it may be too late for that).
I’d like to thank every one of my commenters, editors, and contributors. This site is what it is because so many people join in on the discussion. Anyone who thinks he or she can cause positive change their community simply by creating a blog and yammering away into the void is delusional. I need my commenters. I need contributors. Peoria Pundit is not about inflicting MY opinion onto the public (although that’s a part of it). It’s about creating an environment that encourages frank discussion.
Has Peoria Pundit made a positive difference? I honestly do not know. There’s no control group, no parallel world where Peoria Pundit and all the other blogs do not exist, giving as an opportunity which we can compare and decide which is better.
It’s easy to get discouraged. I’ve hammered away at the theme of essential services first. Some of the people I’ve wanted to win election to city offices have won. But I look at the votes being taken recently and I still see silly decisions being made regarding TIFs and bailouts for favored businesses. But I also hear of boondoggles that would have been embraced for six years ago never making it to the floor of the council.
But even if blogging changes nothing, it’s not because of a lack of effort. At the very least, blogs like Peoria Pundit, Peoria Chronicle, Peoria Illinoisan, Knight in Dragonland, Scott Janz’s site, Brad’s Blog and others make it impossible for government and the media to go merrily about their way telling us only what they think we need to know.
On a personal note, this blog keeps me sane, and I’m not being facetious. I don’t know what I’d do with myself if I didn’t have this outlet to vent my frustrations with the world. I started this site as a lark back when I was still working in newspapers, and quickly discovered that it was the first time I had ever really experienced freedom of press. Before then, all freedom of the press did for me was allow some corporation the freedom to use me as a cog their printing press.
What’s new in 2008 for Peoria Pundit? Well, I’ll be trying to keep up with local news and perhaps doing more original reporting. I know, I know. I say this every year. Perhaps this year, I’ll get fired again, and be able to keep that promise.
Tags: blogoversaries, blogs Posted in Overset | 9 Comments »
|
Link ads

|
|
Site news: Why I did it
Sunday, February 17th, 2008There’s a good article in Sunday’s Journal Star about anonymous comments and their role in the public debate. The Henry Holling situation — and how anonymous commenters tried to spread lies about the man on this and other blogs — is mentioned.
Naturally, someone in the comments section attacks me for selling out, kissing ass and general brown nosing. I posted my usual replies. It’s as tedious and boring as it usually is. If you aren’t familiar with the background, go read it.
(more…)
Tags: anonymous comments, blogging, blogs, Henry Holling, Journal Star
Posted in Citizen Journalism | 21 Comments »