Posts Tagged ‘Gary Sandberg’

Blogger bust? Not really …

Tuesday, June 30th, 2009

A grand total of eight people showed up for Blogger Bash. And they weren’t all there at the same time. The event lasted from 6 p.m. until I left at 10:30 p.m.

Why was attendance so light? I dunno. Competing events that tend to attract bloggers. A lack of marketing by ME this time around. The crappy economy. Who knows.

The conversation was good, and the companionship. I got to meet HipKat. He and the adorable Cristi from Peoria.com was there. Frequent commenter SHay was there, as was Precinct Committeeman. C.J. and Gary Sandberg showed up, as well as his son, Cosmic Colt (I’m going to interview him later about cool ideas he has for the Riverfront).

But I will schedule the next one for a Friday or Saturday night, probably in late July or early August. I am open to ideas for location.

The Bash was good for Whitey as he eight eight customers on a day that otherwise would have been very slow. He sold beers, sodas and four pizzas. I’m only sorry we couldn’t in more thirsty people

A double first in the Peoria Journal Star

Friday, June 19th, 2009

Check out today’s column by Terry Bibo. There are two firsts.

1. Gary Sandberg and Merle Widmer are on the same side. They’ve been sniping at each over recently, mainly because they differed on the library vote.

2. Not only DOESN’T the column take potshots at either of them, the column is actually pretty much on their side.

Someone in upper management must not have been paying attention. Because the PJS has a long history of looking for reasons to criticize these two curmudgeons.

Meanwhile, Merle lays into Dick Durbin.

Local: A few taxing questions for Gary Sandberg

Wednesday, March 26th, 2008

I’m asking Gary because he was the Peoria City Council member who moved to increase the city’s tax on hotel room rentals from the 1.5 percent called for in the Hotel, Restaurant and Amusement tax by another half percentage point to 2 percent.*

  • What essential city services– such as police and fire protection or infrastructure — will this tax revenue go to support?
  • Since when did a tax become acceptable because someone other than Peoria residents (in this case, the people we’re trying to lure to the city) would pay it?
  • Exactly who is going to decide how this money is going to be spent? Will people from Tazewell, Woodford and other counties be deciding how to spend money collected in Peoria?
  • Exactly how high can this tax go before the cost of a hotel room start scaring away conventions?
  • Exactly how does a tax become less objectionable because other taxing bodies MIGHT pass along a similar burden onto their hotels?

* That’s a whopping 33 percent increase in the city’s tax on hotel room rentals.

Local: No ‘Meigs’ field solution for Kellar Branch

Friday, November 23rd, 2007

At-Large City Council member Gary Sandberg sent the following email to City Manager Randy Oliver, and the response was what I predicted it would be:

Randy et al:

Is there or has there been ANY DISCUSSION or CONSIDERATION, MENTION of tearing up or otherwise causing physical damage to the rail lines or rail bed of the Kellar branch IN or BY THE ADMINISTRATION? Unlike Chicago, Peoria is a City Manger form of government and if the Administration has considered breaking Federal Laws or if contacted by elected officials and the Administration did nothing to IMMEDIATELY DISPELL any illegal activity I want to know the extent of those discussions and/or activities immediately.

Lastly, I would expect that the Police Department has been notified of the potential illegal actions suggested to be committed and a proper investigation undertaken as to the conspiracy aspects of such a egregious suggestion. After all, “The Rule of Law” is the foundation of a civilized society as well as the Oath of Office compels each of us to uphold the Constitution, in all areas, not just whether a home is connected to a septic field.

Gary Sandberg, At Large

The reply:

Gary:

The Administration never has and never will be involved in any illegal activity. The Police Department’s District patrol cars have been alerted to the possibility that someone may try to destroy public/private property. Any actions of this type will not be tolerated.

I hope you and your family had a Happy Thanksgiving.

Randy

Local: Playing Hūsker Dū with new streets and sidewalks

Tuesday, October 16th, 2007

Lack of funding for district projects had two district council members demanding changes at the Peoria City Council’s first meeting over the 2008 budget.

Barbara Van Auken was angered that the preliminary $22 million capital improvement budget had no funding for the Sheridan Triangle facade improvement program in her 2nd District. It was especially galling because last week, she tried and failed to get the council to approve spending on an engineering study* the project, which was supposedly included in the budget now in effect.

“I want to make sure … I fully understand the process,” she said, sarcastically. “I thought the district council members would have been contacted and asked about their capital needs in their district. I never got that call.”

Last year, council members were given an opportunity at the start of the process to rank a list of proposed capital improvement projects. That didn’t happen this time.

Clyde Gulley wanted the capital budget to include money to install sidewalks on various streets in his 1st District. He was dissatisfied with the given explanation, that Peoria School District 150 was consulted about what its wished were concerning the streets near Manual and they didn’t consider the sidewalks a priority.

“Even recently, we are still having problems with people having to walk in the street because there are no sidewalks,” Gulley said. “And the explanation is because we’re trying to figure out where the new schools are going to be, and that reason has nothing to do with these streets.”

How projects end up on the capital improvement list one year, and took up quite a bit of time at the relatively short budget meeting. There was no satisfactory explanation given for why this happens, or what criteria is used, other than general changes in politics or the will of the council.

At-large member George Jacob asked the administration to prepare a list of these dropped projects over the last several years. He called it a “HÅ«sker DÅ« game of trying to remember what was promised.”

Jacob also suggested a two-year budget cycle might make the process more fair and less subject to whim.

City Manager Randy Oliver, who seemed a bit taken back by the request for a dropped project list, agreed that a two-year budget cycle is something he would recommend, although it’s too late to do this year.

The council members who spoke seemed ready to abandon what has in the past been a practice of showing favor to those projects for which a claim is made that it would generate revenue on some way. Other consideration, such as neighborhood stabilization, not to mention the length of time neighbors have been waiting, should be given greater consideration.

At large council member Gary Sandberg was critical of both the process and the lack of funding for capital improvement projects.

“We are too timid to our infrastructure,” he said. “We want to pass a magic wand with TIF money. The magic isn’t there. Need to start funding capital projects. We are holding our breath and are going to pass out from lack of oxygen.”

He noted he is often criticized for not voting for budgets that are agreed upon by consensus.

“I will vote for budgets that invest in Peoria. It comes through new taxes. It’s not magic. It’s not through economic development (schemes).”

Mayor Jim Ardis said he agreed with most of Sandberg’s comments and said they are worthy of future discussion, but noted that TIF and enterprise zone projects use money that cannot be used for these sorts of infrastructure improvements. Also, he said any additions to the “revenue stream” would need to be identified before they are added to the capital improvement list.

I’ll discuss ideas for additional revenue in a future post.

* City Manager Randy Oliver has a different version of the background on the project.

Good news for democracy

Thursday, November 16th, 2006

Peoria will be allowed to hold an election for at-large city council seats after all. And the Journal Star’s award-winning (snicker) editorial board has come out in favor of doing way with cumulative voting for at-large seats. That’s a position I favor. The difference is that I think at-large seats on the council weakens neighborhoods. The Journal Star believes it might be their best shot at getting Gary Sandberg off the council.

I have news for the name gnomes: Sandberg could win election to the council from ANY of the city’s five districts. You see, the average voter is about ten times smarter than the average member of the JS editorial board.

Gary Sandberg,cumulative voting

Gary Sandberg for governor?

Saturday, November 4th, 2006

From Prego Man, a real grass roots campaign:

He has more government experience. He’s not cut from “college professor” cloth. He’s strong-willed. He has a proven track record of representation. And, he was once married to a very hot babe.

Rich Whitney has no more business being Governor than I do… and that’s not a damned bit. Sandberg, I believe, would make a great Governor of Illinois. But, a fact is a fact. If I write-in Gary Sandberg, I might feel really good, but I just wasted my sacred vote.

Just like all of you “radical” Whitney backers will do.

Wrong. My vote for Whitney will be counted. Your vote for Gary would be tossed into the trash bin.

And each percentage point for Whitney will further encourage the growth of so-called third parties.

Battle looming over pet license fees

Wednesday, September 27th, 2006

Remember last year when the City of Peoria and the County of Peoria seemed about on the verge of war over which governmental body was responsible for holding prisoners until they make their first appearance before a judge? It was the most public of many disputes the city and county seem to have over jurisdictions and financial responsibilities.

This latest dispute will be over the fees paid by county residents to register and vaccinate their pets. State law makes counties responsible for “rabies and registration” and with investigating reports of animals biting humans. Many years ago, the city agreed to assume these functions through the entire county, provided the city gets to keep all the rabies registration fees, which usually generates a little more than $300,000 a year.

The trouble is that the rabies control program alone costs $328,000. And the department’s entire budget for all programs — including stray animal impoundments, sick/injured animal rescue. ordinance enforcement, cruelty/neglect investigation, shelter operation and pet redemption by owners — totals about $773,000. Remember, this is a city-run department that provides services for the entire county — and people from neighboring counties will drop off animals at the shelter. They take the animals, because they would just end up dumped in the nearby park of left tied to the shelter’s fence, says Animal Shelter Director Lauren Malmberg.

So why not just raise the rabies registration fees to cover the costs of running the shelter?

First, state statute gives only counties the power to set the fees. Malmberg last year asked the county to raise the fees for cats and dogs from $6 and $17 to $10 and $20. The committee to whom Malmberg made the request tabled it and it hasn’t been brought back up. That lack of a decision has forced city residents to pick up an increasingly larger percentage of the share of running a program that serves the entire county.

Second, even if the county eventually agrees to raise the rabies registration fee, it won’t rise enough to cover the entire cost of the program. City Manager Randy Oliver said that any fee large enough to do that would be so high, it would discourage rabies vaccination, which is the last thing they want to see happen.

And some members of the council — especially at-large council member Gary Sandberg and Fifth District Council member Pat Nichting — want the county to pick up a bigger share then simply passing along the rabies registration fee.

So the board council decided by consensus Tuesday to contact the Peoria County Board to ask them to consider raising the fee. The trouble is, all the Peoria County Board members are elected, too. And they probably don’t want to raise fees and annoy voters. Besides, they probably won’t believe any suggestion from the city that it might stop running the rabies registration program because I have to imagine the problem of stray dogs is potentially a bigger problem in the city than in rural parts of the county.

Two-thirds of Peoria County residents live in the city. These residents have come to expect services from city government, even though services that state law says must be provided by county governments. Two thirds of Peoria County Board members represent districts almost entirely within city limits. But it’s easier for these guys to take a pass on the responsibility of running the things they are responsible for running. After the meeting, I heard an anecdote about a County Board member who receives maybe two emails a month from constituents. I imagine even at-large council members get that many emails an hour. In a political environment like this, why should a County Board members elected to represent a district bother to struggle to get services to his or her constituents, when it’s easy to go along, get along and campaign on the issue of keeping taxes and fees low? Answer they won’t. Unless the public gets wise.

The end result is a Peoria County Board that operates as if it should serve ONLY those areas outside city limits, even though two-thirds of the county by population is the City of Peoria. They do it because voters let them.

As you all know, I live outside the city limits of Peoria. So I’d like to thank all you suckers inside the City of Peoria for paying to keep the strays off my yard.

Peoria Animal Welfare Shelter,PAWS,Gary Sandberg,Pat Nichting,Lauren Malmberg

JS finds time to agree with Gary

Tuesday, December 27th, 2005

Two weeks ago, the Peoria Blogosphere was all abuzz about the cost the City of Peoria incurred with its “River City Review” mass mailing. Council Member Gary Sandberg made an issue of it a week ago today. Today, the Journal Star gave it a thumbs down:

Twenty grand may be pocket change in a $106 million budget, but it still comes at a time of tight bottom lines, with skyrocketing pension/health-care obligations and talk of tax increases. It’s simple: Do a good job and the public relations will take care of itself.

Amen.

But why did it take so long to say so? Perhaps they have a special, time-consuming process they have to go through before they can print anything that agrees with a position taken by Sandberg.

Not that that happens very often.

gary sandberg,river city review

The wheels of government turn slowly

Friday, October 7th, 2005

Last week, City Councilman Gary Sandberg sharply rebuked Pat Landes, Peoria’s director of planning and growth management, for suggesting that permit approval sometimes takes a matter of minutes.

Apparently, this is also a problem in Chicago.

People want to do away with the bureaucracy to speed things up and make the city a good place to do business.

But they also want a ton of rules to make sure that nothing unsafe, unsightly or immoral sets up shop next door.

It’s like matter and antimatter. You can’t have both.

gary sandberg,pat landes,zoning,permits,peoria

Gary gives his all

Friday, October 7th, 2005

Gary Sandberg rides a Harley and looks the part. But he also serves on the Peoria City Council. It’s not that often you encounter a male politician who can wear his hair in a pony tail. It’s become his trademark, much like a bow tie used to be. But all that may change:

Imagine Gary Sandberg with a shaved head. The longtime Peoria city councilman is donating his head for a good cause. A golf outing and dinner/dance Oct. 15 will benefit Kristin Gilles-Koch, a Kickapoo girl with Down’s syndrome and a long history of surgeries. She needs an “airway clearance system” which insurance won’t cover. It costs $16,400. Bidding starts at $250 for a swipe at Sandberg’s trademark flowing locks. Mayor Jim Ardis announced Sandberg’s effort tonight. Sandberg remarked that three former mayors would likely be ready with dull shears. The golf outing is at Laurel Greens, and the dinner/dance is at Kickapoo Sportsman’s Club.

Gary has quipped that there are at least three former mayors who are lining up to take a whack at his head.

I think he sorta looks like Daddy Warbucks. At least he’s wearing a bow tie.

gary sandberg,bald

Time for a change in how we elect the City Council?

Thursday, October 6th, 2005

Think about it. With the strong exception of Gary Sandberg, and the somewhat weaker exception of Chuck Grayeb, when is the last time at at-large member of the Peoria City Council assumes a leadership role in shepherding major project through the City Hall?

Meanwhile, the five district council members are constantly fielding phone calls from constituents with issues.

The current set-up is the direct result of a lawsuit settlement filed to increase minority participation on the council. Two of 11 members of the council are black, which isn’t great improvement in that area. And any political scientist will tell you that at-large election work against the election of minorities.

It seems to me that the city would be better served if members were elected from 10 distinct and smaller districts. There’s also an argument that could be made that Peoria would benefit from a strong mayor form of government, rather than the council manager we now enjoy. Yeah, I know that smacks of the pre-”reform” days of Mayor E.N. Woodruff, but I doubt we need to worry about speakeasies coming back.

The council alone could not decide to do this. It would require a referendum. It’s something to consider.

gary sandberg,chuck grayeb,peoria,elections

Laugh all you want Mr. Bailey

Sunday, September 25th, 2005

The Journal Star’s Mike Bailey finally got around to writing about Gary Sandberg’s idea to tax newspaper boxes to pay for maintaining the hanging flower baskets along West Main Street. He says that the newspaper boxes are unpleasant to look at and a potential safety problem, and that gives the city the right to regulate whether they are placed on the city’s right of way. And besides, the JS’s editorial board supports doing anything possible to keep the baskets filled with pretty flowers.

(more…)

It’s all over, but expect some shouting

Wednesday, September 21st, 2005

In the end, the Randy Oliver came up with wording
that notified Illinois American that they weren’t going to try to buy the company that didn’t mention “due dilligence.” So Gary Sandberg was happy.

But don’t be surprised if the phrase pops up at least once or twice at every single council meeting for the next few months or so.

water buyout,randy oliver,gary sandberg,illinois american,due dilligence

Ugly little boxes, uglier little lies

Tuesday, September 20th, 2005

I had a hard time keeping a straight face during tonight’s council meeting.

During the “new business” section, At-Large council member Gary Sandberg came up with an idea to accomplish two tasks with at once.

(more…)