Posts Tagged ‘Peoria City Council’

Reconsidering Peoria Pundit

Tuesday, June 23rd, 2009

I’ve been blowing off meetings of the Peoria City Council for a while now. More on that later.

Today, I went to Whitey’s for pizza, carbonated refreshment and post meeting conversation.

I was sitting there with Gary Sandberg, C.J. Summers and three nice people who are trying to affect some changes in how the City of Peoria does business.

I won’t violate the “What is Said at Whitey’s Stays at Whitey’s” rule. But I will say this: The conversation turned to how policy is made in Peoria.

The short answer: “Poorly.”

Technically, policy is might be set in public, but the process of arriving at the decision is not. Remember th e good old days when people argues on the floor of the council. I miss those days. All the crap got laid out in front of God and everybody. These days, stuff appears on the agenda. Someone will make a short speech in favor of it, and someone else — probably Sandberg — will point out the shortcomings. Sometimes there’s not even that. And I’m not talking about routine business, but important votes.

And then there is a vote and it passes.

So how does policy get made. The answer is, if not on the floor of the council, is during phone calls and emails, and during social events. The public is not welcome, unless they are invited.

So that’s why I haven’t been attending many meetings. I’ve been under the weather, sure. But I’ve also been sick of hauling my ass to council meetings and liveblogging a bunch of 11-0 and 10-1 votes on things that should have been a lot closer.

So how does someone have a voice in changing policy?

I’ve seen what packing the gallery can do to carefully crafted plans. I’ve witnessed what a ton of phone calls can do switch votes. And I’ve seen how blogging the Holy Hell out of an issue can, sometimes, get the people affected by government agitated enough to do something about it.

But I haven’t really been blogging the Holy Hell out of anything recently, except Iran and maybe some School Board stuff.

So, the green is going bye-bye for now (I’m still going to be all over Twitter). This blog is moving back to Peoria. But more than that, tt’s going to take a different kind of blogging that what I’ve been doing recently. I’m open to suggestions, comments, criticism and insults.

Firefly Energy a little dim with details about financial health

Tuesday, June 23rd, 2009

From WEEK:

Peoria’s revolutionary battery company – Firefly – has hit a bump in the road.

The company co–founder confirms Firefly has recently had two rounds of layoffs.

Mil Ovan would not give specific numbers. Sources say it’s about 15 employees and Ovan says that’s generally correct.

Ummm … sorry, Mil Ovan, but you’ve gotta be more forthcoming with data than that. After all, the good people of Peoria city and county invested in your company. Remember that $6 million loan you got from National City Bank? Those loans were guaranteed by taxpayers.

I am utterly baffled as to why the City Council did that, considering there’s absolutely no guarantee these loans would translate into permanent jobs. Even if your “revolutionary” battery technology it a hit (big “if” there, pal) there’s no guarantee you will built them here. Can considering that Caterpillar created and is part owner of your little start up company, it’s not lot The Great Yellow God couldn’t guarantee the loan.

And since $6 million is kinda FRIGGIN’ HARD TO COME BY THESE DAYS, you will for give those of us who work are asses off to pay these taxes for being a little concerned that a company that has $6 million of our money starts laying people off. Telling us that the details aren’t really our business is not good mojo.

I mean, do you people even HAVE a business plan? I mean, other than waiting for military contracts, or waiting for someone to come along and sprinkle some magic stimulus spending plan dust on your company? I mean, if your technology is GOOD, the PRIVATE sector would buy into it.

Perhaps it’s time for the Peoria City Council and Peoria County Board to haul you ass in and take a look at your books.

BWAHAHAHA … sorry, folks. That would assume either government body possessed a sense of responsibility that was more powerful than its fear of what would happen if they didn’t do exactly what Caterpillar tells them to do.

City Council to meet behind closed doors

Friday, June 5th, 2009

From my inbox:

NOTICE AND AGENDA

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF PEORIA, ILLINOIS, WILL BE HELD ON THURSDAY,
JUNE 11, 2009, BEGINNING AT 5:00 P.M. TO BE HELD AT THE
CATERPILLAR GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS CENTER, ROOM 124,
834 N. DURYEA, PEORIA, ILLINOIS, AS FOLLOWS:

ROLL CALL

INVOCATION & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

ITEM NO.1 Consideration of a Motion to go into EXECUTIVE SESSION
to Discuss 2(c)(1) The appointment, employment,
compensation, discipline, performance, or dismissal of
specific employees of the public body, including hearing
testimony on a complaint lodged against an employee to
determine its validity.

ADJOURNMENT

Got crime in your neighborhood? Call a landscaper

Tuesday, May 12th, 2009

I don’t claim to be an expert in the laws that govern how cities collect and spend money. I know that money that goes input certain funds cannot be pulled out and put into other funds. I know that’s it’s not all one big pile of money.

Nevertheless, any city with a nearly half-million-dollar projected deficit that is going to cut police overtime and put  fewer police officers on the street, has no Goddamn business whatsoever spending $56,000 to pretty-up a drop off area for a public facility that will be used by the exact same number of people regardless.

Good God.

When your garage or your car has been broken into, or when neighborhood punks are selling drugs on the corner, don’t call the police. Call a landscaper.

No liveblogging tonight

Tuesday, May 12th, 2009

This SHOULD be the last meeting I miss for a while. I’ve got too much stuff to do today. Readers can follow on WCBU or on Channel 22 in Peoria. Here is the agenda. (C’mon, it’s not like they really debate anything).

UPDATE: As I look at the agenda, the only things that look int3eresting from a neighborhoods standpoint is news that AmerenCILCO  is going to start charging for installation of alley street lighting.

Liveblogging the Peoria City Council

Tuesday, April 28th, 2009

False alarm. i had to leave. watch it on Channel 22.

I’m here with my Dell Mini, ready to go at 6 p.m. The joint is jammed with Boy Scouts. As always, updates will be posted to the top. With budget cuts on the agenda, this will be a loooooong meeting.

Local: Peoria leaders figure out a new way to kiss Caterpillar’s big yellow butt

Wednesday, May 14th, 2008

Caterpillar Inc. is fixing up its parking deck. Good for them. For them. It’s their deck, they are responsible for it. In a totally pure free-market, free-enterprise system they ought to be responsible for those costs. One of those costs, one assumes, would be to find a place for its workers to park.

After all, there isn’t a mini-mall, mega-mall or a hot-dog stand that isn’t forced to comply with strict standard that state exactly how many parking spaces must be provided. The number of the spaces is set my ordinance. The number of handicapped spaces is set by ordinance. The width and length of the spaces are set by ordinance. The cannot just say that their customers and employees are going to park on the street. They have to either buy enough land to build their own lots, or make arrangements with nearby property owners who have a surplus.

But not if you are Caterpillar. For them, the free-market is a concept to be trotted out to argue that it should be able to do business anywhere, with anyone, without restriction from pesky rules and regulations.

But when it suits their interests, they are like pigs at the public trough.

So, Caterpillar simply went to the city of Peoria and announced they wanted to pave over the ground at the former Sears Block and have it’s minions park their cars there. Don’t worry, we’ll pay for the costs and cover the cost for providing security at the site. This would be roughly equal to the rental space the city otherwise would be able to get from the spaces.

Well, that was the theory when this was discussed during an executive session following the last council meeting.

Caterpillar didn’t need to pay rent, the thinking was, because it was “a wash.”

Council member Gary Sandberg now says that he was told that the process would take about five mnths. But the agreement presented to the council for approval Tuesday stated that it would take as long as 7 1/2 months, a 50-percent increase. In other words, the city was losing 50-percent more rent that the council had been led to believe.

Sandberg lectured the council:

“We are going to have to start treating our business assets with some business sense, like Caterpillar does,” he said.

“I guess I misunderstood the math” and “didn’t understand the length,” said City Attorney Randy Ray, adding that the “wash” was based on “rough math.”

“It’s not lost OR found money,” Ray said.

Mark Johnson of Caterpillar (I can’t find his title right at this moment; I’ll get it later) told the council that the company doesn’t know exactly how long the repairs will take. The deck, he said, is 45 years old.

“Instead of just patching it up, we want to do a major overhaul,” Johnson said. “I expect it (the length of the agreement) was extended so it could a a little cushion.”

Council member Barbara Van Auken, who earlier expressed doubts the longer length of the agreement made it a wash, said she trusted Johnson’s word and was among those who voted to approve the agreement.

But the biggest defense came from Peoria Mayor Jim Ardis.

“I have absolutely no problem with the agreement,” Ardis said, “considering all the good Caterpillar does for our community.

“I don’t think this is one we need to dig our heels in on, folks.”

The vote to approve was 9-1, with Councilman Eric Turner abstaining (he works at Caterpillar) and Councilman Pat Nichting, who was absent.

Sandberg told me after the meeting that the city essentially gave up about $100,000 in revenue by not renting Caterpillar the space. And then there is the revenue that the owners of privately-owned parking decks lost because Caterpillar didn’t have to rent spaces from them on the open market.

So the council not only screwed the taxpayers out of incoming revenue, they screwed some private businesses out of some cash as well. It’s sorta like if the city is standing outside of restaurants handing out free hot-dogs and soda.

And here’s my last comment/question about this whole mess: I assume these improvements to the Sears Block include paving it over and laying down some parking stripes. Exactly what good will these improvements be to the city once Cat’s own deck is completed? After all, aren’t they going to have to tear it our to build their museum and Caterpillar’s visitor center?

A wash? This thing sounds like a hosing from day one.

NOTE: Corrected to change weeks to months.

Local: City Council gets back to work Tuesday

Friday, May 9th, 2008

Vacation is over.

After a three-week break, the Peoria City Council will meet at 6:15 p.m. Tuesday. And judging from the agenda (viewable here), it looks to be a long meeting. Bring a pillow, as I would not be surprised if this thing doesn’t end until after 10 p.m..

There are seven proclamations scheduled. There are 31 items on the consent agenda that could, theoretically, be approved with a single vote. Fat chance. At a glance, I can easily envision half of these items being taken off the consent agenda for additional discussion.

Here’s one I noticed: Staff is recommending spending $6,227 to fully fund neighborhood association newsletters. This program was cut last year, much to the consternation of neighborhood associations. This year, they have decided to forgo spending $2,500 on the “Citizen Academy” and instead divert the money to the newsletters. No doubt there will now be complaints about that, as some have praised the program for helping neighborhood groups learn how the city bureaucracy works.

And the issue of whether to issue a Class A license to Elliot’s is scheduled to be taken off the table. As I reported earlier, the matter may be resolved after federal mediation.

Local: Campaign for Walkable West Bluff meets tonight

Tuesday, March 18th, 2008

cwwb-logo.jpgVia C.J.’s site, I discovered the Campaign for a Walkable West Bluff. They will be meeting tonight at  6:30 p.m. in Bradley Hall, Room 142. I don’t think I’ll walk, but I will drive over. Beats going to some lame Peoria City Council meeting.

Basically, what they want to do is actively campaign for the city to actually use the principles of New Urbanism, as opposed to just talk about them, which is all that’s happened so far. I’m tellin’ ya, Peoria is a great place for spending a lot of time and money to develop plans that sit on the shelf while the city rubber stamps whatever the bureaucrats place in front of them.

I’m not nearly as sold on New Urbanism as others, but I’m much more positive than negative. I’m favorable about anything that puts the breaks on the mad rush to expand further to the north and abandon the inner city.

Local: It’s time for the Peoria City Council to start talking trash (UPDATED)

Friday, March 7th, 2008

I’m closing comments on this post because I don’t want to steal any thunder from C.J, Summers’ excellent article, complete with Beth Akeson’s photo evidence, on why Peorians are forced to place their trash on the sidewalks in front of their homes.

I’m sure I’ve posted on it before. I grew up on Frye Avenue in the East Bluff. With the exception of homes on corner lots, every single house on this street had an alley in the back. And when I was growing up there, that’s where people put their trash. And every week, a garbage truck came along and and picked it up. It was the simplest thing in the world.

Drive down that venerable street on any garbage day and you will see trash bins and other junk piled in front of people’s homes. Why? The only answer I have ever been able to get is that this is the way that Waste Management wants it, and it’s not up to the city to tell them otherwise.

Excuse me? Isn’t Waste Management a contractor hired by the city, and therefore be required to meet standards set by the city? If the city council so chooses, can it NOT pass an ordinance requiring that trash bins be placed in the alley behind homes where there IS an alley? And wouldn’t WM be forced to start servicing the alleys — which waste haulers all over the known universe do every day (except in Peoria, apparently)? And wouldn’t WM want to comply, in order to be considered when the contract comes up for renewal?

But I don’t blame Waste Management. It’s just a business, albeit a big one. Of course they are going to want to do as little as possible for as much money as possible. If they think they can save a few man hours by making people throw their trash on the sidewalks or streets in front of their homes, instead of in the alleys behind their homes were tradition and logic say it belongs. And they do contribute services to neighborhood groups when they do clean-ups.

No. I blame the Peoria City Council.

Call me crazy, but I think that when you elect people to represent your neighborhood’s interests, that’s what they ought to do, instead of worrying about hurting the feelings of giant corporations like Waste Management. Yet time and again, I’ve seen seen councils past and present approve agreements that are brought to them by city staffers as the best that can be done when they really are not. The excuse often is that the city has to look at the needs of the business. Meanwhile, the businesses are looking to get every dime they can.

Individually, council members complain when the details don’t work in the city’s favor. Occasionally, and recently, they have been fighting back. The recent insistence on a second look at the health care contract comes to mind. Too bad that six out of 11 council members couldn’t have put their collective foot down back when the Waste Management agreement was approved.

But this status quo with Waste Management is untenable, and the pictures on C.J.’a site proves it. We cannot seriously think we are making strides in cleaning up Peoria after decades of neglect while we still make residents put their trash in front of their homes when there’s a perfectly good alley behind their homes.

I don’t know about other blogger in Peoria, but THIS blogger is going to keep revisiting this subject from now until the upcoming municipal election, which start less than a year from now.

That means 11 months and more of: ‘So tell me, council member, what have YOU done about the trash problem?’

Remember this question, and ask it as often as you can.

UPDATE: Yes, I am aware that the pictures on C.J.’s site are of homes without alleys. My point is that we need to clean up Peoria by requiring trash pick in alleys WHEN THERE ARE ALLEYS. Thank you.

Local: City Council Agenda

Friday, March 7th, 2008

I’ll go over the agenda for the next Peoria City Council meeting later, but for now, here’s the agenda: (more…)

Local: Knock me over with a feather — PJS opposed to hiring new firefighters

Wednesday, March 5th, 2008

The Peoria Journal Star editorial board — an entity that has consistently argued in favor of closing inner city fire stations while promoting increased spending on “quality of life” projects that have little to do with essential city services — today used City Councilman Eric Turner’s warnings of red ink to argue, again, for keeping Fire Station 11 closed. Of course, they scoffed at the idea of eliminating non-essential quality of life junk from the budget.

The JSEB has been editorially pimping the library expansion for close to a decade, so you know they will screen bloody murder if the council declines to burden taxpayers with that debt curing this recession. Today’s editorial on the surface might seem to be an argument for fiscal responsibility. But it’s really an argument in favor of further decay of the inner city so that the city can afford to pay for amenities for suburbanites.

Local: The bucks stop at Peoria City Hall

Tuesday, February 26th, 2008

I didn’t attend tonight’s Peoria City Council meeting. I did listen to WCBU (while watching the action on Public Access channel 22).

There some chatter at the end about Councilman Eric Turner’s call for a hiring freeze. He now says it wasn’t directed at firemen or police officers. But I note that he never said they would be excluded from this freeze he is promoting. Mayor Ardis, Robert Manning and others said it’s far too early to suggest that the city is in financial trouble, since they don’t even know what how much revenue is coming in.

Ardis at one point said it was “irresponsible” to suggest there’s trouble looming (although he later said that might have been too harsh a word. And, he assured council members that the city financial condition is being monitored daily if not hourly by city staffers.

Manning looked peeved. He suggested that instead of talking about freezes, the city ought to first look at ending city spending tax money on quality-of-life spending like library expansion and construction and building museums on the waterfront.

Councilman Gary Sandberg said if there is a freeze, it ought to take into account the relative value of the positions being frozen. Caterpillar wouldn’t decline to fill a position if that position was necessary to producing the products it sold. Turner, who works at Caterpillar, said that Sandberg doesn’t have any idea how hiring freezes work at private industry.

And here’s a heads up about those financial reports that are coming up in March. I’ve heard that revenue from Hotel, Restaurant and Amusement taxes are DOWN by about 20 percent. Ouch.

Local: Council afterthoughts

Wednesday, February 13th, 2008

I hope everyone enjoyed the Peoria City Council meeting today. It was both short, AND boring.  Here are the bullet items:

  • The council punted on what was to be the big story, a new attempt to pass an ordinance mirroring the state law banning smoking inside commercial establishments. The goal is supposedly to “capture” 100 percent of the ticket revenue. But council member Ryan Spain asked to table the vote until the state comes up with rules on how the state law is supposed to be enforced. Gee, if only the state would do that before they pass legislation like this.
  • Council member Barbara Van Auken seemed a little frustrated that no one seconded her motion to table a measure to contact state legislatures to urge them to reconsider future changes in state police and firefighter pensions that put burdens on city governments. She said she needed more time to study the issue, but Mayor Jim Ardis said it’s well established that the state legislature has a habit of increasing pension benefits to these workers, forcing municipal governments to foot the bill. Van Auken is probably the most outspoken advocate for police and firefighters on the council these days. Mayor Ardis is brother to a firefighter, but doesn’t seem to be having any problems behaving as a member of management.
  • Council members Gary Sandberg and Pat Nichting have been sniping at each other a bit recently.  So it was a little funny to see them unite on the losing side of the 8-2 vote to approve the “agreement and release” that effectively ends Randy Oliver’s tenure at Peoria City Manager. Nichting didn’t discuss his reasons. But Sandberg opposed a section of the agreement that states neither party will “engage in any derogatory statements or discussions concerning the actions of or performance of the other, recognizing that the resignation submitted is intended to be for the best interests of the city and the residents.” Sandberg complained that the term “derogatory” is subjective. “I don’t want to be derogatory. I want to be candid. [The agreement} will not allow for transparency.”
  • Council member Clyde Gulley can be a bit long winded and more than a little meandering when he speaks on an issue. But I agree with his request for an explanation why members of the Peoria Police Department sometimes ticket cars for violating the snow ban on roads that have already been plowed from curb to curb. That seems like a really good question to me, too. The ban exists only to get cars off the snow routes so crews can plow. Once the snow is plowed away, ticketing cars that park on cleared roads seems rather, well, abusive.
  • This being Peoria, there’s no way simply tabling an issue keeps it from being discussed anyway. There was some discussion at the end of the meeting about how the police plan to enforce the state’s smoking ban. Police Chief Steve Settingsgaard said his department plans to visit some establishments suspected of ignoring  law. It’s only fair, he said, because other establishments are obeying the law and shouldn’t have to compete against those that do not. Violators are reported to the Peoria Liquor Commission. Sandberg said that in his experience bars and restaurant tend to be obeying the rules more than other businesses, so it makes no sense to target them. Council member Bill Spears asked what the police were doing to enforce state law in businesses that don’t have liquor licenses. Settingsgaard said other agencies might have to take care of enforcement elsewhere. Police traditionally have a role in making sure liquor license holders follow the rules. But because there’s no enforcement rules in effect, the fact is that some businesses will get away with it, while others will not. Funny, I thought there’s something in the U.S. Constitution requiring equal protection under the law. Apparently not in Illinois and not if you have a liquor license.
  • Sandberg, Gully and George Jacob voted against the city’s new sidewalk policy. It seems  they didn’t like an amendment that requires the city use Tax Increment Finance funds on all new sidewalks in areas inside a TIF district. There was some debate on whether or not this rule would be too restrictive.

Peoria Pundit Radio: Talking points for today’s program (CANCELED)

Sunday, February 10th, 2008

UPDATE: After 10 minutes of a message telling me that”no web audio servers are available,”  I gave up. I wish BlogTalkRadio the best. I didn’t even know if I was on the air or not. Apparently, they will need it.

NOTE: I’m going on the air in 40 minutes.

I’ve been a little under the weather, so I don’t know how long my voice will hold out. I’m HOPING that I get some callers today (show starts at 4 p.m. and can be heard here) to take some of the pressure off. The listener call-in number is (347) 326-9459.

What’s on the agenda? I want to talk about the elections, specifically Jehan Gordon’s victory over Allen Mayer, Aaron Schock’s victory over John Morris and Jim McConoughey, and the whole presidential drama.

Locally, I want to get into what’s upcoming with the Peoria City Council, including taking odds on whether or not the city will pass it’s own smoking ban ordinance AND the odds of passage of any increase in the HRA tax rate. And I want to touch on security at Peoria City Hall, and what, if anything, the city should do in light of what happened in Kirkwood, MO.

Links: