Posts Tagged ‘Peoria School District 150’

District 150 to fire primary school librarians? (UPDATED: It’s true)

Friday, May 22nd, 2009

A parent involved in her kid’s PTO says that she has heard that primary school librarians have been given a pink slip, and that the District 150 Board of Education will vote on Monday to permanently fire them as a cost-saving move. The news was delivered by Superintendent Ken Hinton during a meeting Wednesday evening.

Librarian duties will apparently be picked up by teachers, who already are facing higher class sizes. Not to mention the fact that school teachers are not trained librarians.

Also, this same parent passed along a rumor that the school district is not going to pay for band and orchestra education at all in the primary schools. The parent thinks, as do I, that this essentially ends high school band in the future.

UPDATE: The Journal Star’s Dave Haney has a story up now, basically confirming my source. Hinton told him that no decision has been made, which is officially true, but Hinton knows there isn’t more than one person on the board who would dream of voting now.

There’s some talk in the article about actually fighting this decision. Good luck.

This is the money quote:

“Some were angry, some immediately jumped in ‘what can we do about this?’ to a lot of jaws hitting the table,” Kristen Coker-Schlink, the library manager at Hines Primary School, said Friday of their shocked reaction. “The unfortunate thing is our schools are not meeting AYP (Adequate Yearly Progress), reading being one of them – one of the more important ones – and if you can’t read, you can’t do math, you can’t do a lot of things.”

The article states that librarians earn $16,000 and $25,000. So, one assistant superintendent sucks up the salary of 4-5 librarians.

I attended Kingman and Glen Oak primary schools through the eighth grade. I only vaguely remember the Kingman library, but I vividly remember Glen Oak’s tiny little library in the basement. I loved it. I read and reread every book on Abraham Lincoln, Greek and Norse mythology and a bunch of the science fiction. Librarians were like angels to me then. When I ran through all the books on a subject I liked, they directed me to books I would like.

I read and write now because of these people.

But we don’t have money for librarians any more. Although we can afford to close and demolish old schools like Kingman and Glen Oak and build brand new education factories.

District 150 auditors don’t want the public to see district audit reports

Wednesday, April 29th, 2009

So, you’re an auditing firm that failed to find anything wrong at an institution that hired you specifically to see if anything was wrong. Later, after you give it a clean report, it becomes apparent that plenty is wrong. So what do you do? Simple. You figure out what went wrong and announce the results to the public, since the taxpayers are are the ones who paid you. Public audits are all about transparency and accountability. Right?

Wrong. If you are Clifton Gunderson, you hide behind the argument that the report you completed is a private document and cannot be revealed to the public. Seriously:

District 150 attorney David Walvoord said a financial review of the middle school, including its activity fund, by Clifton Gunderson LLC, the district’s auditors, received a “clean bill of health” last year, when Davis, now an academic officer in the school district’s central administration office, was a principal there.

Walvoord said District 150 has a practice of reviewing its schools every two to three years and always when a principal leaves a building.

A request of the review under the Freedom of Information Act was approved by District 150 officials, but Clifton Gunderson officials on Tuesday were disputing its release, claiming the review documents were their property and not subject to the act.

Laura Petelle, who takes her seat as a member of the school board, is something of an expert on the Freedom of Information Act and she might has an opinion on Clifton Gunderson opinion and on the district administrator’s wisdom in letting Clifton Gunderson decide what documents are public and which are not.

Seriously. It’s not like the documents reveal the formula for Classic Coke, or anything.

Good God what a mess.

Whistleblower files federal lawsuit against Peoria Scool District 150

Tuesday, April 28th, 2009

Here is a copy of the federal lawsuit filed today. I am going through it now. Apparently, one of the allegations fired Lindbergh Middle School Principal Julie McArdle makes is that her boss, Mary Davis, ordered to her falsify the home addresses of several out-of-attendance-area students so that there would be no room for poor students who qualified to attend Lindbergh under provisions of the No Child Left Behind Act.

I’m no attorney, but I would think that at the very least, this might put District 150’s federal funding at risk.

This is in addition to the unauthorized credit card that Davis was using, and paying off with money from the student activity fund.

McArdle Lawsuit

Our next Peoria School Board member speaks on whistleblower firing

Tuesday, April 28th, 2009

from Laura Petelle’s blog:

If in fact McArdle WAS wrongfully terminated as retaliation for bringing up financial misconduct, I am absolutely furious and that is absolutely unacceptable. And regardless of whether McArdle’s termination was justified, I certainly expect the Board and administration to act with the same speed and alacrity to fire those engaged in financial misconduct, as that misconduct is proved, as they have acted with in firing McArdle.

If, as the Journal Star is reporting, the District was first informed of the financial shenanigans six months ago and has failed to take action until now — that in itself is appalling.

My questions: Did ANY member of the Peoria School Board bother to ask Superintendent Ken Hinton exactly when he first heard of McArdle’s concerns? And did he tell the board? id the school board? If he did, then the board  knowingly fired someone they knew was a whistleblower? Diid the district’s attorney give them ANY advice about the wisdom of firing someone who was alleging criminal behavior by her superiors?

And WMBD 31 has more details about the documents that allegedly show wrongdoing by administrator Mary Davis.

Administrator to be fired at District 150 (UPDATE 2X: Admin under police investigation)

Saturday, April 25th, 2009

This story is still developing, but I’ve confirmed from a very reliable source that an administrator described as “high ranking” is going to be fired very soon by Peoria School District 150. My source does not know the name or position of this administrator, but it is NOT superintendent Ken Hinton. Money — the need to save it — was cited as the reason.

This information came to me as I am looking into a tip that an administrator is suspected of making unauthorized credit card payments and taking money from a school’s student activity fund. This information came in late Friday, and I was unable to get enough confirmation to name names.

It’s very possible these two tips are unrelated. But the first tip about the firing is solid, I believe.

To avoid potentially libelous speculation, comments are closed. The second item will remain “blind” until I am able to speak to the parties involved or see a police report.

Send information to me via the contact form.

UPDATE: Mike Scally of the Peoria Police Department has confirmed that officers received a report Friday afternoon that an administrator at District 150 is suspected of misappropriating finds. The department is investigating and he declined to name the person being investigated.

This confirms part of the tip I received.

No doubt more to follow.

UPDATE 2: My source added this information. Some of the credit card usage went to carrepairs and to “American Girls,” a high-end doll store in Chicago. At some point,  it appears that student activity fund money was used to pay off some of the credit card bills.

Local: D150 talks down to the unwashed, ignorant masses

Saturday, May 3rd, 2008

Two good posts from C.J. Summers about District 150’s plans to slash instructional time at all 12 primary schools. They are located here and here. Leave it to C.J. to provide documentation proving the district is talking about of both sides of its mouth.

But Diane Vespa, herself a Kellar Primary School parent, illustrates perfectly the lack of respect the district shows parents by essentially telling them they are just to stupid to understand why teaching students 45 fewer minutes a day is a good idea.

The audience sat patiently as Asst. Superintendant Cheryl Sanfilip presented the changes to parents as an amazing and unlimited opportunity for our children. Although parents were asked to submit their questions in advance of the meeting, Ms. Sanfilip did nothing more than wave the 3 page list of 44 questions in the air as she repeated her talking points. She did take a few questions afterwards, but unfortunately, her answers seemed to only give rise to more questions. In her defense, the questions and commentary were relentless and completely devoid of any appreciation of the “unlimited opportunities” she was offering. Many of her answers were defensive but she was facing quite a perturbed gathering. She persisted as best as she could despite the “unprofessional” conduct of some of the audience members as described by Board Member Jim Stowell.

Well, we’re quite familiar here with Jim Stowell here at Peoria Pundit. He’s in no position to lecture anyone, let alone concerned parents, about “unprofessional conduct.” And it’s utterly typical of D150 school board members to believe it’s their job to sell the public on whatever schemes vomit forth from school administrators than to represent the wishes of the taxpayers/voters/parents they are supposed to represent.

This is the same top-down, take-it-or-leave it attitude they showed to residents of the East Bluff and the Near North Side when they wanted to close all the schools in these neighborhoods, and build one super-sized school inside Glen Oak Park. And they continued to show these residents this lack of respect … right up to the moment the Peoria Park District said “no.” And it was only because of pressure from the Peoria City Council (especially Bob Manning) that made them finally listen and agree to two new schools, one at the site of the current Glen Oak School location.

And this is what makes me unsure that the forces of common sense and reason will inevitably prevail here. I’m not sure that there’s anything the Peoria City Council or any other agency can do to force D150 to stop this mess. If there is … please do it, guys,

Some months ago, Peoria Mayor Jim Ardis publicly put the kibosh any any suggestion the city would even consider a takeover of District 150, an action I’ve advocated for a long time. Maybe this most recent episode of ignorance, ineptitude and arrogance will convince Peoria’s powers-that-be that these folks don’t really want the type of high-quality, family-friendly programs that Peoria needs, and that some sort of city or state take-over is needed.

Local: D150 to meet with concerned parents

Wednesday, April 30th, 2008

A shortened school day and the elimination of two part-time teaching positions at all Peoria School District 150 primary schools will be the subject of an informational meeting scheduled for 5:15 p.m. Thursday at Kellar Primary School, 6413 N Mount Hawley Rd.

I have been told that parents from other schools are welcome to attend as well. The more people who show up to express their concerns, the less likely the school board will approve this plan.

HOINews has an article here. C.J. blogged about it here. My original article is here.

The following announcement from the Kellar PTO was posted on Peoria.com:

You may or may not be aware that the members of the District 150 School Board are preparing to vote on proposed changes that may substantially impact your child’s elementary school education.

Part one of the proposal calls for SHORTENED SCHOOL HOURS. If passed, school hours will be reduced by 45 minutes each day. The proposed new start time for Primary schools (at least for Kellar) will be 9:15 a.m.

Secondly, specialized instruction in gym, science, music and computers is on the chopping block. Primary schools will only be allowed the equivalent of two full time special teacher positions. The home room teachers must then assume responsibility for these subjects, regardless of their training or background.

Our initial reaction, as parents, is one of concern that our children’s education may be compromised as a result of these changes. We feel that there are alternative cost cutting measures that can and should be taken first that would not put the burden of the deficit squarely on the backs of our young children. As parents, we have the right to expect adequate education and exposure to the arts and sciences in our public schools.

The School Board argues that these proposed changes, in addition to saving the district money, will actually enhance the educational experience. They feel that less time will be spent transitioning children between classes, and that classroom time will be more devoted to learning.

You be the judge! We have arranged an informational meeting to take place at Kellar this Thursday evening, May 1st at 5:15 p.m. District Administrators have confirmed that they will be present to answer your questions and address your concerns.

Time is of the essence. This proposal is being fast-tracked and may very well be voted on at the next School Board meeting on May 5th.

It is our responsibility to watchdog the School Board and Administration to make sure that the Districts limited resources are being allocated in a way that is most beneficial to our children. We cannot entrust this responsibility to teachers or school staff, as their very employment is dependent upon the actions of the aforementioned entities.

We hope to see a very large and concerned presence of District 150 parents on Thursday. We then hope to have a very large group of informed parents at the School Board meeting on May 5th.

Local: Don’t bother District 150 with annoying concerns about safety

Friday, February 1st, 2008

East Bluff Barbie has a very infuriating post about school bus safety. It seems the district can’t afford to put safety monitors on a bus after her son reported bullying. Funny, isn’t it, how they can toss away hundred of thousands to buy all those houses on Prospect. I’m sorry, I shouldn’t question the school administration’s commitment to the children. Because all we heard from then during the the Glen Oak School relocation controversy that this was their main concern, the children. Just ask them.

UPDATED: Corrected a detail.

Local: Peoria Police to hold assemblies in schools (UPDATED)

Monday, October 22nd, 2007

That’s announcement that was made at the end of tonight’s meeting of the Peoria School District 150 Board of Education. The subject of the assembly was not released, and will be revealed by the City of Peoria at a press conference scheduled for 1 p.m,. tomorrow at Peoria Police Headquarters at the corner of Walnut Street and South West Adams.

I’m going to go out on a limb here and guess that it have something to do with jaywalking.

And there’s another press conference at 5:30 p.m. before the start of the regular Peoria City Council meeting about joint anti-littering effort by District 150 and the city. For that one, they issued a press release. They are having a song-writing contest. It’s called “Rappers Against Wrappers.”

No, that is not a joke.

UPDATED: The Journal Star is reporting that there’s been an unspecified arrangement following a meeting with the NAACP, the King Holiday Committee, city officials and the police. I’m guessing that these police-run assemblies in the middle schools and high schools is part of the arrangement. There’s no word on whether part of the arrangement includes dropping the tickets. I don’t see Don Jackson and Rita Ali dropping their protests unless the tickets are dismissed. I’m almost positive the city wouldn’t drop the tickets unless there was a weakness in the case. Remember that Rita Ali claimed to witness the incident and that she saw no jaywalking, nor the walking-down-the-middle-of-the-road behavior.

Sigh.

More tomorrow.

Local: District 150 school board meeting tonight

Monday, October 22nd, 2007

The last time I attended a meeting of the Peoria School District 150 Board of Education I attended was waaaaaaay back during my Journal Star internship. So, it’s been at least 20 years.

I’m going to tonight’s meeting of the committee of the whole, which is scheduled to begin at 6 p.m. at the district office at 3202 N. Wisconsin Ave. The first thing I need to figure out is why in the heck they have committee of the whole meetings instead of just regular plain old board meetings. It just strikes me as odd.

This is the first board meeting following the final public hearing on the Woodruff High School feeder school site.

The next regularly scheduled board meeting is at 6:30 p.m. Monday, Nov. 5, at the office.

Today’s news: Out on the town

Friday, October 19th, 2007

Unless noted, all links are via the Journal Star:

  • If this “GateHouse News Service” report on how Insight Cable is going to carry some Bradley University basketball games is anything other than a press release, I’ll eat my fictional season tickets. What? No one was available in the JS newsroom to make a phone call for an additional quote or two?
  • I found the tone of this article on the last of four public forums on the site if a proposed new Woodruff High School feeder school to be entirely too condescending. The writer accused those who wanted a two-school option for appealing to emotion. Really? They want to be able to send their children to a school within walking distance, and that makes them emotional? Feh. This brief article on 1470 WMBD probably caught the real news, that moderator Brad McMillan conceded that the two school option is on the table because of input the district received at the forum.
  • Peoria School District 150 is keeping the public in the dark about its plans for Manual High School, some say. At least the district is consistent.
  • The Peoria City Council will have five options to consider Tuesday when they discuss a proposal to expand the 4 a.m. liquor license zone. Great. That means the meeting is probably going to be that much longer. I’m favor of making the entire downtown area an “downtown entertainment zone,” with relaxed rules for providing alcohol AND entertainment. Either we want a vibrant, active nightlife in the downtown, or we don’t, and we need to stop businesses from having to jump through hoops when they try to provide exactly what they need to provide for this to happen.
  • It was an accident that killed Danny Dahlquist, the Peoria County Coroner says. Funny, I always though an accident was something like tripping down the stairs. Maybe the guy’s buddies were innocently walking outside Dahlquist’s bedroom when they tripped, and the fireworks they were holding fell out of their hands, slid underneath the locked bedroom door and were ignited by the friction. Yeah, that’s the ticket. I just hope all the legal technicalities interfere with their busy academic life at BU, where they are attending classes while awaiting trial for on charges of aggravated arson and possession of an explosive or incendiary device. No one who watches the justice system in Peoria thinks they will actually go to trial, heaven forbid, or be convicted of a crime that actually leads to prison time. So look for a plea agreement for something considerably less than aggravated arson.

Local: Much common sense spoken at District 150 meeting

Tuesday, October 16th, 2007

Kudos to pundit blogger Brad Carter for his first-hand report of Monday’s Peoria School District 150 Board meeting. I’m beginning to appreciate PJS reporter Clare Jellick’s reporting these days, but I have to say I found Brad’s longer report to be a bit more comprehensive. I’m not being critical of Jellick; it’s just that print has a bias toward brevity and against presenting complex ideas that aren’t easily expressed as black and white.

I’m glad to read that Terry Knapp is still communicating his opinjions and ideas to the board. Mr. Knapp was my freshman science teacher at Woodruff, and I have the highest respect for him. He was a bit of an educational renegade even then, as he took his responsibility to educate his students seriously, even if it occasionally brought him into conflict with the rigid thinking of the administration.

So when a man like Terry Knapp expresses criticism of federal No Child Left Behind legislation, and with how District 150 is implementing it, I tend to think that concern is genuine, and not just special pleading from a teacher’s union guy.

Keep up the good work, Brad.

Local: Playing Hūsker Dū with new streets and sidewalks

Tuesday, October 16th, 2007

Lack of funding for district projects had two district council members demanding changes at the Peoria City Council’s first meeting over the 2008 budget.

Barbara Van Auken was angered that the preliminary $22 million capital improvement budget had no funding for the Sheridan Triangle facade improvement program in her 2nd District. It was especially galling because last week, she tried and failed to get the council to approve spending on an engineering study* the project, which was supposedly included in the budget now in effect.

“I want to make sure … I fully understand the process,” she said, sarcastically. “I thought the district council members would have been contacted and asked about their capital needs in their district. I never got that call.”

Last year, council members were given an opportunity at the start of the process to rank a list of proposed capital improvement projects. That didn’t happen this time.

Clyde Gulley wanted the capital budget to include money to install sidewalks on various streets in his 1st District. He was dissatisfied with the given explanation, that Peoria School District 150 was consulted about what its wished were concerning the streets near Manual and they didn’t consider the sidewalks a priority.

“Even recently, we are still having problems with people having to walk in the street because there are no sidewalks,” Gulley said. “And the explanation is because we’re trying to figure out where the new schools are going to be, and that reason has nothing to do with these streets.”

How projects end up on the capital improvement list one year, and took up quite a bit of time at the relatively short budget meeting. There was no satisfactory explanation given for why this happens, or what criteria is used, other than general changes in politics or the will of the council.

At-large member George Jacob asked the administration to prepare a list of these dropped projects over the last several years. He called it a “HÅ«sker DÅ« game of trying to remember what was promised.”

Jacob also suggested a two-year budget cycle might make the process more fair and less subject to whim.

City Manager Randy Oliver, who seemed a bit taken back by the request for a dropped project list, agreed that a two-year budget cycle is something he would recommend, although it’s too late to do this year.

The council members who spoke seemed ready to abandon what has in the past been a practice of showing favor to those projects for which a claim is made that it would generate revenue on some way. Other consideration, such as neighborhood stabilization, not to mention the length of time neighbors have been waiting, should be given greater consideration.

At large council member Gary Sandberg was critical of both the process and the lack of funding for capital improvement projects.

“We are too timid to our infrastructure,” he said. “We want to pass a magic wand with TIF money. The magic isn’t there. Need to start funding capital projects. We are holding our breath and are going to pass out from lack of oxygen.”

He noted he is often criticized for not voting for budgets that are agreed upon by consensus.

“I will vote for budgets that invest in Peoria. It comes through new taxes. It’s not magic. It’s not through economic development (schemes).”

Mayor Jim Ardis said he agreed with most of Sandberg’s comments and said they are worthy of future discussion, but noted that TIF and enterprise zone projects use money that cannot be used for these sorts of infrastructure improvements. Also, he said any additions to the “revenue stream” would need to be identified before they are added to the capital improvement list.

I’ll discuss ideas for additional revenue in a future post.

* City Manager Randy Oliver has a different version of the background on the project.

Local: Protestors make their case against Peoria Police

Saturday, October 13th, 2007

I attended the protest outside Peoria Police Department headquarters this morning. Rather than rabble-rousers out to play the race card and demand special treatment for black people, I met and talked to people who sincerely believe that the ‘Manual 22′ case is yet another instance of racial profiling.

Several people I talked to or overheard completely agreed that there’s a problem with groups of young men congregating in the middle of streets, refusing to get out of the way for cars and sometimes threatening drivers.

But that isn’t the case here, they said.

Rita Ali, director for diversity at Illinois Central College, made a case that the tickets weren’t deserved. She said she witnessed the tickets being issued at Manual. She was in her car driving in the 2400 block of West Wiswall when an unmarked police car stopped in front of her, and a group of officers got out and surrounded a group of students who were walking on the side of the road, not long after crossing the street.

“I was not blocked by any students who were walking in the middle of the street,” she told the group of approximately 30 protesters. “There were no sidewalks and the students were walking as close to the curb as possible.”

The only thing blocking her path was the blue, unmarked police car in front of her, and the second unmarked police car that came in behind her.

“I thought it was a drug bust,” she said. “It looked like a sting operation.”

While many of the students being ticketed were upset, some of the officers were laughing and joking, Ali said. In response to a question from a student, one officer replied “we’re just doing what we’ve been told to do.”

Much has been made of the announcements made over the schools’ public address systems warning students that tickets might be issued if they jaywalk or block cars. Ali said she was inside Manual High School right before school let out, and she heard no announcement. Others complained that parents were not notified in writing — much like there was no warning given to parents informing them that a young Manual student was raped walking to school earlier this year.

Others scoffed at Peoria Police Chief Settingsgaard’s description of the tickets as a way to teach young people how to behave after they leave high school and go off to college. Several protesters commented that if the Peoria Police really want to cut down on jaywalking, they out to set up similar sting operations on West Main Street and University because of high incidence of Bradley University students not bothering to use the crosswalks. Some also questioned why no similar operation was done at Richwoods High School

Ali discussed some of the developments following the tickets:

Twenty-two of the tickets were issued to Manual Students. Ten were issued to Woodruff students, and more were have been written had police not been pulled to an emergency call. Of the 32 tickets, three were issued to white students and one to a Hispanic.

The tickets were issued for obstructing the path of a roadway, not for jaywalking, a less serious offense. Those ticketed will receive letters notifying them the fine will be $75, not $100.

“This was a extremely flawed, poorly planned crackdown operation,” she said.

Ali isn’t buying any denial that the tickets were not a form of racial profiling. The chief ordered a crackdown at two urban schools, she noted, which assured that black students would be those ticketed.

“Whenever racial profiling occurs, they always deny it. It’s part of their creed.”

She wants:

  1. the tickets dropped or changed to warnings;
  2. the city council to form a task force to eliminate racial profiling; and
  3. hiring more people of color for the police force.

The Rev. Andrew Jowers of the NAACP spoke on behalf of chapter president Don Jackson, who was out of town to attend a conference.

He noted that the issue was not discussed at the Sept. 18 joint meeting of the Peoria School District 150 board and the Peoria City Council.

“There was no discussion of the critical safety issue,” he said. When Jowers read the names of those who attended the meeting, there was mumbled laughter when it was noted that 1st District City Councilman Clyde Gulley arrived late.

Former Peoria City Council member Jim Polk laid the heaviest criticism on the city and the police department.

“I know that these rules and these guidelines have got to come from somewhere in city hall,’ he said, noting that his own wife has recently been stopped four times while driving her car into the northern parts of Peoria. “They are trying to break out spirits.”

“It’s about city hall, it’s about the police department and it’s about the police chief,” Polk said, stating that there are rumors that he left his previous job in Milwaukee because of similar issues. He did not elaborate.

“I’m not anti police,” Polk said. “I just want things to be fair and just.”

Sherry Cannon, a community activist with METEC, gave the police more credit than some seemed willing to do.

“I’ll take [Chief Settingsgaard] at his word that he doesn’t believe this is racial profiling. But it’s highly insensitive,” Cannon said. “To us, it feels like racial profiling because you are treating our children differently.”

Organizers urged those attending to pack the Peoria City Council chambers at the next council meeting.

I tried to find out if any of the young people attending the rally — or their parents — were among those ticketed. I couldn’t find any, and Karen McDonald of the Journal Star had the same results.

My two cents: It’s amazing how one’s background affects one’s perception. Chief Settingsgaard and most of my commenters were absolutely incredulous that this could be considered a racial issue. Black people think ‘of course it was racial profiling.’ I don’t think most police defenders are being bigots, nor do I think the protesters are race baiters. There’s not a lot of trust here, and the children of Peoria are watching and learning. There needs to be a way to keep thugs from commandeering the streets without leaving vast segments of the population convinced the police are preying upon them.

Local: District 150 trying to duck out of its role in ‘Manual 22′ tickets

Friday, October 12th, 2007

UPDATE: The PJS has its article about the press conference up.

I noticed this paragraph in today’s Journal Star article about the “Manual 22″ controversy.

But while District 150 Associate Superintendent Cindy Fischer confirmed Thursday the city had notified the district that tickets would be issued to students heading home down streets instead of available sidewalks, she said the crackdown did not stem from a request by the district.

This directly contradicts the information I received Tuesday, than the enforcement effort was at the request of District 150 officials.

I wasn’t the only one who noticed:

Dear Dr. Fischer:

The Police Department advises me that District 150 identified a problem and asked for the Police Department’s help with students in the street around these two schools. The students were creating an unsafe condition for student safety, other citizens and the motoring public. My understanding is that each school made announcements to this effect to the students. The Police, as a result of 150’s request, followed up on the situation.

I believe this situation has the potential to seriously damage the relationship we are trying to build between the two entities. Consequently, I would like to know if my facts are correct. Your email leads me to believe District 150 never asked for any assistance and would have been fine if we ignored the situation.

Sincerely,

Randy [Oliver, Peoria City Manager]

The reply:

Mr. Oliver,

I too value our relationship and feel that in order to create and maintain safe environments for our students as they go to and from school, we need to work together with our city police, neighborhood associations, parents and neighbors. We have asked for your help in several situations when we have had crowds of people who have affected the safety of our children and parents. Your information is correct however, it should be noted that we have not specifically ask that tickets be issued….we just asked for assistance. I believe the PPD is just enforcing an ordinance.

Cindy

Cynthia B. Fischer, Ed.D.
Associate Superintendent

Dr. Fischer is trying to play word games. The district knew that tickets would be issued, because they announced a warning that it would happen over the intercom at all the schools.

Why did Dr. Fischer try to distance the district from the enforcement? I’ll leave it to my commenters to speculate.

I wasn’t able to attend the joint District 150/Peoria Police Department press conference, but these are the school district’s talking points:

We are a continuous partner with the Peoria Police Department to ensure the safety of our students, schools and neighborhoods. It is very important that Peoria’s children feel safe in our schools, but also as they go to and from our buildings.

After several calls were made to the District, we informed the PPD that there were complaints of students lingering in the streets, blocking traffic.

On Sept. 20, an email was sent to all District 150 principals from Debbie Brown, assistant to [school district police] Chief Ron Scales, asking to make announcements the PPD will be enforcing the city ordinance that requires students to walk on sidewalks and not in the middle of the street and that tickets may be issued to those walking in the middle of the street.